<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
0303220318
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
030323
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, March 23, 2003
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM; CHOICES
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1E
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM FREE PRESS COLUMNIST
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 2003, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
WAR COVERAGE DID NOT START WITH CABLE TV
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
Like most Americans, I have been glued to my TV, watching the war in Iraq. My
channel of choice has been CNN. After a while, I began to notice a name I
hadn't heard before: Walter Rodgers.

There it was again. Walter Rodgers. I wondered whether this was a general, or
a strategist, or maybe a soldier exhibiting great bravery, given that his name
-- Walter Rodgers! Walter Rodgers! -- was being tossed about with unabashed
worship.

Well, it turns out Walter Rodgers works for CNN. He is a reporter -- one of
500 or so embedded journalists in this conflict -- given access to ride
alongside the U.S. 7th Cavalry.

Anchor after anchor extolled his reports. "Never before have we seen such
images!" they cooed, even though the images were just tanks rolling through
dirt.

Paula Zahn, the morning host, reran a clip of one of Walter Rodgers' reports,
during which an explosion took place in the distance. No one was hurt, but the
broadcast was interrupted as Rodgers -- and those around him -- asked a pretty
common war question: "What was that?"

When the clip ended, Zahn looked at the camera and said, "Wow."

She neglected to mention that the report was old, more than a day old, and
that rerunning it was nothing short of gratuitous, to show folks how
impressive -- and brave! -- CNN was.

"So far," one anchor actually said, Walter Rodgers and the photos from his
crew have been "the star and the story of this war."

Oh, really?



Reporters are not stars

I thought the stars and the story of this war were the soldiers. And the
intelligence folks who found Saddam Hussein's bunker. And the bravery of the
families waiting at home.

Reporters are not stars. And photographs are not the story. But then, to hear
some of these networks tell it -- and CNN is not alone here -- you actually
would think that nothing like this had happened before.

Sadly, if the TV folks did a little more reading and a little less watching
one another's feeds, they might realize how wrong they are.

They might learn that 150 years ago, using horseback messengers and
steamboats, a small group of reporters got dispatches back during the
Mexican-American War.

They might learn that correspondents were part of the Civil War in the 1860s,
right in there with the soldiers. And that in World War I, reporters sneaked
in lightweight cameras and published photographs from the war fronts --
against the wishes of the military.

They might learn the name Ernie Pyle, who wrote from World War II foxholes and
told stories of real soldiers, homesick and washing socks in their helmets. As
for the "bravery" boasts of the cable TV ride-alongs, they might note that
Pyle was killed by snipers' bullets as he joined troops on an island in the
Pacific.



Remember Murrow on rooftops

They might remember Edward R. Murrow on the London rooftops, or that Korean
War correspondents were shot at as they rode in transports. They might recall
the TV reporting during Vietnam -- not just morale-boosting images, but
gruesome depictions of war. They might learn that female journalists from that
country put themselves in the action, carrying backpacks and sleeping in
trenches, to file stories.

Sadly, there seems to be no perspective or sense of history from many cable
newspeople -- at least not beyond the last Persian Gulf War, perhaps because
they are too young to remember any other conflict.

The only thing new about today's coverage is technology. As for this wonderful
new access, well, a good journalist learns to be skeptical of anything given
too freely. It is not cynical to suggest that capturing pictures of one-sided
victories and cheering Iraqis is good for the U.S. and the military. There's a
reason this embedding was permitted -- especially from an administration that
is otherwise so close to the vest.

Then again, saying this would require some perspective. And that's hard to
find when you're busy patting yourself on the back.



Contact MITCH ALBOM at 313-223-4581 or  albom@freepress.com.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>
THIS ELECTRONIC VERSION MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THE PRINTED ARTICLE.
</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
