<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8701270588
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
870604
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Thursday, June 04, 1987
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1D
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1987, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
FINAL PERSPECTIVE: WE ALL NEED THE CHANCE TO EXPLAIN
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
LOS ANGELES -- I usually do not write about the same subject twice in two
days, but if Isiah Thomas can fly halfway across the country to explain a
10-second remark, then the least I can do is devote  a day's space to the same
purpose.
Let's get two things straight right now -- which apparently some people
missed in the column that appeared here  Wednesday. 1) Isiah Thomas is not a
racist. And  2) Isiah Thomas, like any one of us, has the right to say
anything he wants. To deny either of these statements would be ignorant and
incorrect. Thomas' comment after Game 7 of the Eastern Conference  Final that
"if Larry (Bird) were black he'd be just another good guy" was regrettable,
not smart, but he deserves a chance to explain.

  "What I meant," Thomas said, "was the stereotypes of black and white
ballplayers are still the same as they were 20 or 30 years ago. When Bird
makes a great play, they say it's his thinking and his work habits. When black
players excel it's referred to as god-given  talent. . . . "
  The above paragraph appeared in Wednesday's column, as did many more in
which Thomas expanded on what he says he meant, after which I wrote: "Before
you lambaste Isiah, remember this: His biggest crime was simply leaving a
dangerous statement floating." Thomas admitted that.
  Yet, Wednesday morning, the phones at this newspaper were ringing with
people angry at the mere suggestion  that Thomas had done anything wrong; just
as the Pistons' switchboards were jammed with callers Monday wanting his and
Dennis Rodman's heads for what they had said about Bird.
Let the storm subside
  What a hurricane words can create! On Monday, a Los Angeles Times columnist
wrote, "Isiah embarrassed himself on and off the court." On Tuesday, an LA
Herald Examiner columnist called Thomas "Al Campanis  revisited" and suggested
that "the Pistons must be threatened with a boycott if Thomas isn't fired."
  Wednesday, Thomas  called a press conference for the local media to
explain the whole mess. And  tonight, Thomas will appear here at halftime of
Game 2 of the NBA finals to explain himself to the whole country.
  Enough. The problem, as always, is that people hear what they want to hear.
Those  looking to paint Thomas and Rodman as racists simply took the
statements and ran. They never bothered to call either one.
  And those looking to blindly defend Thomas and Rodman ignored the sting of
their words behind misguided explanations like: "It's a free country" and "the
referees' treatment justified what they said."
  Neither attitude is correct. If you want to be a good fan to Isiah, listen
to what he says now: "I should have expanded. . . . that was my mistake."
Thomas is a good man, one of the best. But he is not a saint, he is not
perfect, and you do him no favors by holding him to such  standards.
  And those of you ready to jump on Thomas as a racist for one sentence
should first consider the man (and if you know him, you'll stop right there)
and then consider the circumstances:
  I was present when that question was asked. It was less than a half-hour
after the Pistons lost their biggest game of the year. Thomas was surrounded
by at least 20 reporters. The remark took all of  10 seconds and then two
dozen more questions were asked, none of which had anything to do with Bird or
race.  It was truly a puzzling, isolated remark.  No one ever asked him to
explain.
Even Bird has  forgiven
  If anyone has a right to be upset over this thing, it is Bird -- who, as
stated here Wednesday, is a great player, whether white or purple.  And here
is what he said when asked about it Wednesday:
  "Hey, it was in the heat of battle. I understand that. I've been in certain
situations where I've blown off . . . there's things I've said I wished I
didn't say.  . . . Hey, I know Isiah.  I don't take that as a racist remark. .
. . It was just a frustrated comment. . . . I don't hold nothing against
Isiah."
  And so today, neither should anyone else. There was no need for Rodman's
obviously  incorrect comments about Bird's talents, but he made them. There
was no need for Thomas to spend a sleepless night worrying if all he had done
the first 26 years of his life was about to be tossed out  the window. But he
did. There was no need for all the overreaction, the angry phone calls, the
insults. But it happened. It is the sad reality. Words are explosive. 
  And now, let us bury it. Thomas  will make his statements tonight.  Rodman,
 we hope, will properly account for his words sometime soon, and -- with the
valid points raised by Thomas concerning stereotypes -- the best thing that
can  happen is that a lesson is learned for future.  Songwriters  Paul Simon
and Art Garfunkel wrote " . . . A man hears what he wants to hear and
disregards the rest."
  We've all just seen where that  gets you.
  Let's not go there again.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
COLUMN;REACTION;QUOTE;ISIAH THOMAS;BASKETBALL;RACIAL;LARRY
BIRD
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
