<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8701270789
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
870605
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Friday, June 05, 1987
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
STATE EDITION
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1D
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1987, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
FINAL PERSPECTIVE: WE ALL NEED THE CHANCE TO EXPLAIN
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
LOS ANGELES -- If Isiah Thomas can fly halfway across the country to
explain a 10-second remark, then the least I can do is devote a day's space to
the same purpose.

  Let's get two things straight  right now --  1) Isiah Thomas is not a
racist, and 2) Thomas, like any one of us, has the right to say anything he
wants. To deny either of these statements would be ignorant and incorrect.
Thomas' comment after Game 7 of the Eastern Conference final that  "if Larry
(Bird) were black he'd be just another good guy" was regrettable, not smart,
but he deserves a chance to explain.

  "What I meant," Thomas  said, "was the stereotypes of black and white ball
players are still the same as they were 20 or 30 years ago. When Bird makes a
great play, they say it's his thinking and his work habits. When black
players excel it's referred to as God-given talent. . . . "
 The Pistons' switchboards were jammed with callers Monday wanting Thomas' and
Dennis Rodman's heads for what they had said about Bird.
Let  the storm subside  What a hurricane words can create! On Monday, a Los
Angeles Times columnist wrote, "Isiah embarrassed himself on and off the
court." On Tuesday, an LA Herald Examiner columnist called  Thomas "Al
Campanis revisited" and suggested that "the Pistons must be threatened with a
boycott if Thomas isn't fired."
  Wednesday, Thomas  called a press conference  to explain the whole mess.
He appeared with Bird at another press conference Thursday in Los Angeles, and
Thursday night, he was scheduled to appear at halftime of Game 2 of the NBA
final to explain  himself to the whole country.
  Enough. The problem, as always, is that people hear what they want to hear.
Those looking to paint Thomas and Rodman as racists simply took the statements
and ran. They never bothered to call either  one.
  And those looking to blindly defend Thomas and Rodman ignored the sting of
their words behind misguided explanations like: "It's a free country" and "the
referees' treatment justified what they  said."
  Neither attitude is correct. If you want to be a good fan to Isiah, listen
to what he says now: "I should have expanded. . . . That was my mistake."
Thomas is a good man, one of the best.  But he is not a saint, he is not
perfect, and you do him no favors by holding him to such standards.
  And those of you ready to jump on Thomas as a racist for one sentence
should first consider the  man (and if you know him, you'll stop right there)
and then consider the circumstances:
  I was present when that question was asked. It was less than a half-hour
after the Pistons lost their biggest  game of the year. Thomas was surrounded
by at least 20 reporters. The remark took all of 10 seconds and then two dozen
more questions were asked, none of which had anything to do with Bird or race.
  It was truly a puzzling, isolated remark.  No one ever asked him to explain.
Bird isn't squawking  If anyone has a right to be upset over this thing, it
is Bird, who is a great player, whether white  or purple.  And here is what he
said when asked about it Wednesday:
  "Hey, it was in the heat of battle. I understand that. I've been in certain
situations where I've blown off. . . . There's things  I've said I wished I
didn't say. . . . Hey, I know Isiah. I don't take that as a racist remark. . .
. It was just a frustrated comment. . . . I don't hold nothing against Isiah."
  Neither should  anyone else. There was no need for Rodman's obviously
incorrect comments about Bird's talents, but he made them. There was no need
for Thomas to spend a sleepless night worrying if all he had done the  first
26 years of his life was about to be tossed out the window. But he did. There
was no need for all the overreaction. But it happened. Words are explosive. 
  And now, let us bury it. Thomas made  his statement Thursday. Rodman
apologized earlier in the day, saying: "Coming off a very emotional loss, I
was very frustrated at the time I made those statements. I was wrong for
making those statements  and honestly that is not the way I feel. It was a
mistake. . . . 
  "I have the utmost respect for Larry Bird as a player and a person, on and
off the court. He is one of the best players in the NBA  today and maybe one
of the greatest players ever to play the game."
  With that said and the valid points raised by Thomas concerning
stereotypes, the best thing that can happen is that a lesson is  learned for
future.  Songwriters  Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel wrote: " A man hears what
he wants to hear and disregards the rest."
  We've all just seen where that gets you.
  Let's not go there  again.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
