<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8801290221
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
880629
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Wednesday, June 29, 1988
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL CHASER
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1D
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1988, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
OLD MAN CONNORS AND THE SEA OF TIME
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
WIMBLEDON, England --  Picture a man dangling on a rope, sharks in the
water, snapping at his flesh. The man is Jimmy Connors, the sharks are the
tireless young tennis players  who keep coming and  coming. And one of them
just rose up and bit him in the butt.

  Jimbo exits Wimbledon. Who knows whether this is last time? He is 35 now,
the wins come harder and harder, and the opponents are nameless,  faceless.

  "How much did you know about this guy before you played him?" someone
asked Connors, after he lost a five-set match to unheralded West German
Patrick Kuhnen, 5-7, 7-6, 7-6, 6-7, 6-3, exiting  this year's Wimbledon in the
fourth round.
  "I don't know anything about anybody," sighed Connors, once the king of
tennis. "They're all 15 years younger than me now. They speak a different
language.  They listen to different music. They're a different generation. . .
.
  "But I never watched tennis anyhow. I never went out and scouted guys, I'm
not gonna do it now. I don't mind playing a guy like  him, if he beats me,
fine. The question is, can a guy like that play that well tomorrow and win?"
  "Can he?" someone asked.
  He grinned. He snorted.  "We'll see."
Jimmy always took the fifth 
  Same old Connors. Snotty when he wins. Snotty when he loses. But this was
something odd, something disturbing -- if you've come to admire this aging
brat with the pageboy haircut.
  He'd never  lost a five-set match here to anybody but Bjorn Borg. You get
Connors into the fifth set, you're looking the dragon in the mouth, you're
heading into the abyss. Call home. Make out the will. Connors  may be dirty
mouth and dirty finger, but when the chips are down, he is all heart. 
  And yet Tuesday, that old reserve let him down. He escaped match point
late in the fourth set against Kuhnen,  came back to win and tie it up. You
could smell the kill. Jimbo was salivating.
  "The German should've finished him while he had the chance" the fans
whispered gleefully. "Now Jimmy will take him  for sure."
  Nothing is for sure. Not life, not marriage, not a tennis career. Connors
faltered. He ran out of gas, and, afterward, he shrugged. No venom. No poison.
He has been facing retirement questions every year at this tournament. This
time, after Kuhnen, (ranked 90th in the world) captured the last nine points
of their match, there was none of the usual nasty answers or insults.
  "Will  you come back?"
  "I don't know. Ask me next year."
  "But do you plan to return?"
  "I'll tell you this. If I play next year I'll just play places that I
enjoy playing, even if they're not  the biggest places. The tournaments that
give me a hassle? I'll just pass on those."
  And he may have been talking about Wimbledon. On Monday night, he was
about to serve in the third-set tie-breaker against Kuhnen, when suddenly, it
began to drizzle. Without warning from the umpire, a crowd of groundskeepers
ran onto the court, pulling the tarp right over Connors' foot; they almost
Vince Coleman-ed  him to death.
  It was a sadly fitting picture: Jimbo, who has made the finals six times
here and won the whole thing twice, being buried before his time by a group of
over-eager nobodies.
Better  brash than bland 
  Remember last summer? Connors' match against  Mikael Pernfors? When he
rose from the dead -- the dead and gone, to be honest -- trailing 1-6, 1-6,
1-4, and came back to win? What  a moment! It didn't earn him a title, yet it
summed up everything Connors has ever stood for in this game.
  It was pure American spit. Guts, glory -- perfect for Connors, who has
always appeared  a bit more baseball player than tennis gentleman, grabbing
his crotch and yelling obscenities and throwing rackets, balls, whatever. You
may love him; you may hate him; but odds are you didn't ignore  him.  And
journalists, when not the target of his wrath, were actually happy for his
candor, considering the alternative.
  And here came the alternative Tuesday afternoon: Kuhnen, another tall,
robotic,  22-year-old stud in a denim jacket.
  "Is this your biggest win ever?"
  "Yes, of course."
  "How significant was it?"
  "A tennis player beat a tennis player."
  "Did you feel at all  sorry, seeing a great player like Connors lose?"
  "If I felt sorry I never would have won. We are tennis players. There is
no sorry. There is only winning and losing."
  And today, there is only  Kuhnen left standing. Connors is heading home.
After 17 Wimbledons in a row, he may be somewhere else next June.
  Not good news, not if you ask me. Tennis is quickly running out of
personalities,  seeing them replaced with boring executioners.  Ilie Nastase,
John McEnroe, Connors. They may have ruffled feathers, but at least you could
tell them apart. On Tuesday, a British reporter was asking  Connors about his
anger during the final set. Connors ducked the accusation. The reporter
persisted. Connors held firm.
  "Your language was strong," the reporter said.
  "You were sitting too  close,"  said Connors.
  Sharks are biting. He's getting bit. But we will miss this guy one day.
Mark my words.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
