<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8601300181
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
860704
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Friday, July 04, 1986
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
6D
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1986, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
LLOYD LOST FOR ONE REASON: MANDLIKOVA OUTPLAYED HER
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
WIMBLEDON, England -- Wait a minute. I like Chris Evert Lloyd, too, but the
fact is she blew it. The way the American press was acting Thursday you'd
think the Czechs had sent her a bomb disguised  as a birthday cake.

  "Tough break," one reporter mumbled.

  "She really wanted it," said another.
  Hey. Lloyd was up 5-2 and lost 14 straight points in the second set.
Fourteen straight? And that  was after missing an easy shot that sunk her in
the first.
  Sorry. But Hana Mandlikova simply kicked Chris' butt in the semifinals. And
if you  think that term is inappropriate for this sport, you'd  better wipe
off your glasses -- the rose- colored ones.
  This isn't 1910. Women's tennis today is just men's tennis with the speed
turned down. No more dainty hits with long, lazy baseline volleys.  No more
fear of aggression. The women who win today don't spend time doting on
ponytails and tennis dresses. They're too busy sharpening their razor serves
and their stiletto drop shots.
  That's the  way Mandlikova plays. That's the way Martina Navratilova plays.
No coincidence that those are your Wimbledon finalists this year.
'She overpowered me'  None of which takes away from Lloyd, who plays  much
younger than her 31 years. She won the French Open last month. And she had a
much tougher draw than Navratilova at Wimbledon. She played hard against
Helena Sukova and Kathy Jordan, two name players,  while Navratilova flexed
her muscles against -- whom? -- Isabel Demongeot, Kris Kinney and Jane Forman.
  But against Mandlikova in Thursday's semifinal, Lloyd just did not have it.
Period. I don't  know how to say that nicely.
  "Can you explain what happened?" Lloyd was asked in the interview room
afterwards.
  "I just couldn't reach deep down," she said, a tired look on her face. "The
shots  that I hit against Sukova and Jordan just weren't there when I needed
them."
  Indeed, Lloyd sent balls into the net that would normally be winners. Balls
she usually pushes to the baseline were now suddenly flying over it.
  That stretch in the second set was almost too painful to watch. Lloyd,
trailing 1-0 in sets, led 5-2, and the packed Centre Court crowd shifted in
their seats, figuring  this match was going to three.
  Then Mandlikova put two aces past her and won the game without surrendering
a point. A shutout. That made it 5-3. She did it again the next game, breaking
Evert's serve.  It was 5-4. Another shutout. And then again. Another game.
Still no points for Lloyd, and it's 5-5.
  Lloyd hit a forehand long, and the crowd moaned. How many more zeroes? You
could feel the whole  of Wimbledon slipping away from her. Then she put a
backhand into the net. Another moan. How much longer?
  It would be easy to blame this all on a lapse by Lloyd. A mental collapse,
maybe? Temporary  insanity? Only all this time Mandlikova was playing
brilliantly. Her serve was a blowtorch. Her court movement was smooth and
smart.
  "She overpowered me," Lloyd said.
  A few minutes later, she  had won the match, 7-6, 7-5. And she deserved it.
Don't give up on her yet  So there goes America.  The U.S. men were all gone
with the quarterfinals. With Lloyd out, only Navratilova, the
Czech-turned-American,  remains among the women. 
  Obvious bad news for the States. But what was even more obvious Thursday was
how much people dislike seeing "Chrissie" lose. She has the air, the
temperament, and the image  that people seem to root for -- American or not --
especially against the more aloof Navratilova or Mandlikova. I'm sure NBC is
not thrilled about that final.
  But that's the way it went. Sugar and  Spice fell to Wallop and Slice. And
afterwards, Lloyd had to face the inevitable question:
  "Are you thinking about retiring?" 
  "I don't think this match had anything to do with retiring," she  said.
"When I'm ready to retire, I'll retire. I still have one Grand Slam title
under my belt. Now it's time to go home and get ready for the U.S. Open."
  The feeling here is that Lloyd will be back  for one more Wimbledon. But
when she does go, her sport will have a hole ripped through it -- not only
because she is Navratilova's toughest challenger, but because her persona is
such a magnet for the  game. That is why she doesn't need excuses made for her
when she loses.
  "Right now, today and tomorrow," she said, "Hana is playing the best here
besides Martina. She deserves to be in the final, not me."
  Class she has. The best game she doesn't. Not this weekend, anyhow.
  "How disappointed are you?" she was asked.
  "I'm pretty tough," she said, biting her lip.
  And she will be back.  Bet on it.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
TENNIS
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
