<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8702060534
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
870805
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Wednesday, August 05, 1987
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
STATE EDITION
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1D
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>
SEE ALSO METRO FINAL EDITION 1D
</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1987, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
FRIENDSHIP AND TRUTH NOT ALWAYS A GOOD MIX
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
I first met Jim Eisenreich in a Florida parking lot in 1984. Perhaps "met"
is not the proper word. He was walking out of a spring training game, and I
was sitting in my car waiting. I had driven  200 miles. I wanted to talk to
him. But as he passed the car, I just sat there. After a minute, I watched him
drive away. You're always a little nervous when you first interview somebody.
But in  Eisenreich's case, it wasn't my nerves I was worried about. For years,
he had been suffering from a disorder which made him twitch and gasp for
breath uncontrollably. It happened during ballgames. Sometimes  he ran off the
field, scared, choking. No one was sure what it was, although certain doctors
called it "stage fright syndrome." 


Whatever it was, it had clipped his baseball career each time he  reached
the major leagues -- and Eisenreich belonged in the major leagues. He has
tremendous baseball talent. Great power hitter. Good arm. But people had been
cruel, fans had heckled and laughed at  his twitches and tics and doctors made
him feel like a freak. He was trying a "final" comeback with Minnesota that
spring of '84, and, in that frozen moment in the Florida parking lot, I
suddenly felt  my questions would only make things worse.
  That might not stop a lot of journalists. It stopped me. Later that
season, Eisenreich's problem acted up again, and in June of 1984, he
voluntarily retired from the Twins and, ostensibly, major league baseball.
  This past winter I read that he was trying a comeback with the Kansas City
Royals. I made a few phone calls. In January, I went to visit him  at his home
in St. Cloud, Minn.
  We talked there for several hours. He said he had finally learned what the
problem was: Tourette's Syndrome, a neurological disorder which causes certain
uncontrollable responses, such as twitching and barking sounds. He was taking
medication to keep it in check. He denied ever having "stage fright syndrome"
and expressed anger at the Twins doctors who diagnosed him  that way.
  He seemed a little uncomfortable with all the questions, but he answered
them. At times he was even funny about it. By the time I left, we had a nice
rapport, and I left there thinking  I had met a man of remarkable courage and
hoped things would work out.
Looking for a happy ending
  Journalists are people too. They prefer to be liked. But if they follow
the rules of their job,  that's not always easy. I would have liked to have
written Eisenreich's story without calling anyone else. I would have liked to
have written that in person he seemed like every other big league player  I've
ever interviewed.
  Neither would be accurate.
  So I called the Twins doctor, Leonard Michienzi, who maintained that
Eisenreich does not suffer from Tourettes, but is just using that theory  to
cope with his problem. And I included his opinion in the story. I also
included the incidents in which Eisenreich, as a child, was "observed" by
doctors who came to his school and timed his tics with  stopwatches. I
included how sometimes, even his family didn't know how to react to his
difficulties. He had told me all that.
  The article was very long. It concluded with the thought that he deserved
a happy ending, but a happy ending was not for sure.
  It came out in February, just before spring training. The reaction was
considerable. Many readers praised it, they wrote asking how they could  get
in touch with Eisenreich, how much they hoped he made the Royals.
  And since then, he has. He was called up in June and is serving as a
periodic designated hitter. He does not yet play the outfield,  where his
problems usually occurred. But he is in the big leagues. He's won a few games
with his bat. And he's had no troubles. That's great news.
Reporting is no PR job
  So I called Eisenreich  Tuesday morning at his hotel. The Royals are in
town to play the Tigers, and this was the first time our paths had crossed
since January. I wanted to congratulate him.
  "Yeah, it's you," he said  over the phone. He did not sound friendly.
  He said he hadn't liked the article, that it had upset his family. This
was not the first time an athlete has told me that. Journalism is not public
relations.  But this was the last person whom I ever wanted to be unhappy.
  "What about it upset you?" I asked.
  He didn't have specifics. He remembered one part, where I described him
sitting in his living  room. "You made me sound like a bum," he said.
  (I have checked the article. I wrote: "His face is unshaven, his eyes
sleepy-looking, his mouth a crooked line." That is precisely how he looked
that  afternoon. Maybe I should have called him cheerful and apple-cheeked.
But that was not the way he appeared.)
  "That's really what bothered you?" I asked.
  He was fuzzy, because the article was  old already. I can only imagine
certain parts - the claims by the Twins' doctor, the incidents involving his
family, and my impressions that he was not a sure bet, no matter how much I
wanted him to  be -- were some of his objections. What could I say? He had
told me most of it. Perhaps he thought, because we had spent so much time and
had gotten along, that I would simply write things the way he  saw them. But
that is not my job.
  "All you guys just write what you want," he said. My initial reaction was
to argue the point. Instead, I thought about all he had endured already, all
those doctors,  hospital stays, people making fun of him, and I felt again
like I did in that car three years ago.
  I apologized. Not for the words. But for the reaction they brought him.
  "I really just called  to say I'm glad you're in the majors, and I hope
you stay long enough to make everybody forget the other stuff."
  "I'll never do that." he said quietly.
  We hung up. I re-read that article five  times. There is nothing in it
that is false. Nothing written that I did not see or hear. But they are still
my words, my thoughts. About somebody else. Eisenreich is going to read them
one way. You another.  Me another. And I cannot describe, as I sit here and
write this, how lousy I feel. A bum? My god. In many ways, he is the biggest
hero I've ever written about. 
  I don't know how to get that across  to you, Jim. All I know is this: you
want to tell the truth and you want to be somebody's friend. And sometimes
there's no way you can do both.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
COLUMN;REACTION;JIM EISENREICH;MITCH ALBOM;CRITICISM;
INTERVIEW;BIOGRAPHY
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
