<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8502050076
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
850903
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Tuesday, September 03, 1985
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
STATE EDITION
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1D
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1985, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
CONNORS STILL ANYTHING BUT MELLOW ON THE COURT
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
NEW YORK -- Father Time has come to the net, and you half expect Jimmy
Connors to flip him an obscene  gesture before smashing the ball back at his
face.

  The nerve of it all. James Scott Connors,  the original angry young man of
tennis . . . old? Why, the spirit should be ashamed, as should those pea-brain
journalists who keep creating stories entitled "The Mellowing of Jimmy
Connors."

  First  off, the guy is not a cantaloupe.
  Secondly, those stories inevitably feature pictures of Connors sitting on
some couch in some corporate office, his hair blown back, that smiling, Paine
Webber spokesman-look  on his face. No rackets. No crowd. No cursing.
  It figures. If they'd shot him on the court, they'd get the same Jimmy
Connors pictures as always: his face snarling, his hair soaked in Prince
Valiant bangs, dropping tennis balls from between his legs to suggest the
referee just, uh, laid an egg, so to speak.
  Sure, he celebrated his 33d birthday Monday -- Labor Day, how appropriate
-- which makes  him nearly seven years older than John McEnroe, eight years
past Ivan Lendl, 12 years beyond Mats Wilander and an incredible 16 years past
West Germany's Boris Becker. 
  And  so what?
  Questions  are becoming standard 
  You get older, you get smarter. McEnroe, who knows a thing or two about the
game, says Connors is playing some of his best tennis ever. Connors just
grins.
  "If everybody  wants to make me a tombstone, well, let 'em," he said
Sunday. "Just don't put it on me yet."
  Not that they haven't tried. This year especially -- in which he's failed
to win a tournament for the  first time ever -- tennis' original superbrat has
had more dirt tossed on him than an old bone.
  "Why are you still playing?"
  "When will you quit?"
  "What about the younger players?"
  All  standard questions now at a Jimmy Connors press conference.
  Strange, no? Connors has been many things over the years. But never old,
never yielding.
  You can still see him at age 22, the shaggy-haired  No. 1 of the world,
jumping over the net after a win, smooching with an 18-year-old Chris Evert,
sticking that finger in the air, then a few years later, disappearing into a
taxi after losing at the U.S. Open, ducking photographers during a romance
with a Miss Universe, telling McEnroe to "shut up and play" at Wimbledon, and
then, when everybody had just about buried him, coming back in 1982 to
reclaim the No. 1 ranking, marrying a former Playboy Playmate, fathering a
son.
  Stubborn. Boorish. Charming. Rich. There's all that. But Connors has always
been just one thing during a tennis match, and mellow ain't it.
  "I am," he said, "an animal out there."
  Younger isn't always better  He is out there again today, playing with
the same dinosaur of a racket he's been using since 1974.  And if he wins
he'll have more U.S. Open victories than any other man in history, one more
medal for his personal combat vest.
  Fittingly, the challenge comes from yet another young turk -- or Swede,  as
the case may be -- Stefan Edberg,  19.
  I'll take Connors. Most people will. At least most people who've seen the
other side of 30, or who've been told at some point in their lives that a
younger  man can do the job better.
  Or who believes, as Woody Allen once put it, if you get too mellow "you
ripen and rot."
  Thirty-three isn't dead, you know.
  On Monday, his birthday, CBS had Connors  in a jacket and tie, interviewing
McEnroe after a match. He asked who Mac thought was playing well in this
tournament.
  "Well," McEnroe began, "this guy Connors isn't too bad. . . . "
  Nice. And  true.
  Tennis buffs will remember a U.S. Open semifinal in the '70s, in which
Adriano Panatta had Connors bobbing across the court like a duck in a penny
arcade. Panatta whipped it right, Connors ran and got it, left, Connors ran
and got it. Panatta came to the net, put one in the far right corner that
Connors never could get, except he got  it, with the very fingernail of his
racket, and sliced  it down the line for a winner.
  "That," Connors recalled, "was the greatest shot of my life." So far.
  But don't be surprised if he puts a few passing shots by Father Time before
it's all  over. The angry young man hasn't rotted yet.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
COLUMN
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
