<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8702120281
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
870906
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, September 06, 1987
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
STATE EDITION
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1E
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITTCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>
SEE ALSO METRO FINAL EDITION, Page 1E
</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1987, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
IT'S MORE HEAT THAN LIGHT WHEN LEWIS YELLS 'DRUGS'
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
ROME -- There are two things you can count on whenever you hold a big
international track and field competition: (1) A lot of medals will be won by
communist-bloc athletes; (2) sooner or later, somebody  will yell "DRUGS!"

  All week long at these World Track and Field Championships we've had the
former: East Germany and Russia are cleaning up in the medal department. And
now we have the latter. "DRUGS!"  This from the mouth of Carl Lewis. Where you
usually find a foot.

  But not this time. Last weekend, Lewis finished second to Canada's Ben
Johnson in the 100 meters. Saturday, Lewis won the long jump  competition.
  But it was in between that things got interesting. During a British TV
interview on the ITV network Friday, Lewis said, at one point or another, all
of the following:
  "There  are gold medalists in this meet who are definitely on drugs. . . .
That race (between Lewis and Johnson) will be looked at for a long time. . . .
There's a strange air at this competition. Runners are  coming out of nowhere
and I don't think they're doing it without drugs. . . . If I were to jump to
drugs I could do a 9.8 right away . . . "
Where does he get this?
  Now this is pretty juicy stuff,  especially for British television, which
is usually full of programs about butlers, or insects. But juicy or otherwise,
it should not go unquestioned.
  What, for example, did Lewis mean by "gold medalists  on drugs"? Like who?
This question was posed to him Saturday after his long jump competition.
  "I'm not going to point fingers at anybody. A lot of people are doing it.
It's just obvious. . . . It's  just something that you and I know for a fact."
  Well. I appreciate the compliment. But the fact is, I don't know. I would
like to know how Carl knows. Is he privy to the urinalysis?
  Is he overhearing  things? Has he actually seen anyone taking drugs? This
stuff was asked of him Saturday as well.
  "I'm not the only one who can answer these questions," he answered. "Anyone
on this interview stand  can answer. It's not for me to say 'this one is' and
'that one is.' I'm just being honest and straightforward."
  Well. I give him a "maybe" on the first part. "Not exactly" on the second.
The fact  is that crying "DRUGS!" is hardly new: Last year, at the Goodwill
Games in Moscow, several U.S. pole vaulters accused the Soviet athletes of
taking drugs (after they lost badly to Sergei Bubka, the amazing  Soviet
vaulter). East Germany, Cuba and other communist-bloc nations have long been
targets of drug and blood-doping charges -- mostly because their systems are
successful and  secret.
  I do not doubt  certain track and field athletes take drugs or blood-dope.
But if Lewis knows something, he should say so -- if only to keep from looking
like he doesn't know anything. During his ITV interview, he was  heard to
suggest -- in an off- hand mumble -- that Ben Johnson's record was drug-aided.
Whoa. Where does he get that from? When someone asked him the next day,
point-blank, if that was true, he again  said: "I don't think it's fair to
point fingers . . . "
  Which is sort of pointing a finger.
Soon, you question everything
  Lewis says drugs are "ruining the sport." He says athletes who test
positive should be "banned for life." He says America should lead the way with
more comprehensive testing "even though it will definitely put the U.S.
program at a disadvantage."
  Ho. Time out. What  does that mean? That some of the success we've had so
far has been drug-aided? Us? Not just them? "I don't want to point fingers,"
he repeats.
  Now, here is the danger in this: you hear enough of  it, and pretty soon,
every remarkable performance immediately makes you wonder what was in the
orange juice.
  Secret is not always evil. Sure, the U.S. is winning fewer medals than ever
in this sport.  But it's not all needles and pills. Consider that: (1) Our
best athletes have traditionally never gone into track and field. They go into
football, baseball, basketball. Not so in most communist-bloc  nations. (2)
Studies keep showing how American kids are slowly turning more and more into
couch potatoes, while in countries like East Germany, the most promising
youngsters are sent off to special sports  schools, where athletic training is
as much a part of the teenage regimen as MTV is in the U.S.
  I agree with Lewis. Drugs can ruin a sport. But so can wild accusations. If
the medalists here were  artificially aided, it will show in their tests.
  Towards the end of his press conference Saturday, Lewis was asked if booing
from the sellout, pro-Italian crowd  bothered athletes during the competition.
  "Hey, I won four gold medals and I got booed," he said, laughing. "How
should I know?"
  A good question. For a lot of things.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
