<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8902090556
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
891002
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Monday, October 02, 1989
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1F
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1989, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
AS IF ON CUE, LIONS AGAIN SELF-DESTRUCT
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
"We're Here For The Beer"

    -- Sign at the Silverdome
Well, sure. Why else would they come? Unless they wanted a souvenir
football. I believe many of the Lions' passes Sunday were intended  for a
blond woman in the third row.
 
  They couldn't have been meant for the receivers. Not a mile over their
heads. Not two miles behind their backs. The way Rodney Peete and Bob Gagliano
threw that  pigskin, you'd have thought it was still greased. Here goes one to
Walter Stanley -- oops, it hit a sea gull. Here goes one to Robert Clark --
oops, splash! It's in Lake Huron.
  They should have had  Ernie Harwell calling the passes: "High and outside.
. . ." Then again, the Lions'  receivers weren't exactly bucking for a stickum
endorsement. How many balls did they drop? I lost count at eight, when  I left
the press box for a Maalox.
  "We got our hinds kicked," said coach Wayne Fontes after the Steelers
embarrassed Detroit, 23-3, the Lions' fourth loss in as many games. "They beat
us every way  possible."
  Aw, Wayne. Give your team credit. It beat you worse than the Steelers did.
Particularly the offense. Two interceptions? Two fumbles? Three points?
Football people talk of "being on the same page." I'm not sure the Lions were
using the same book. The quarterbacks were in "A Farewell To Arms." The
receivers were working on "Les Miserables."
  QUESTION: Who is Lomas Brown?
  A. A  very tall person.
  B. Jim Brown's cousin.
  C. The Lions' third-leading rusher.
  The correct answer is C. Brown, an offensive lineman who weighs 290 pounds,
took a desperation handoff  from Gagliano and fell forward for three yards.
That's two more than Barry Sanders had all day, and only five fewer than the
Lions' leading rusher for the afternoon, Richard Johnson.
  He's a receiver.
Drops, bobbles  and flubs
  "Wasn't this supposed to be the week you turned it around?" someone asked
linebacker Chris Spielman afterward.
  "Every week's supposed to be the week," he said.
  True. But this week,  at home, against a team that allowed 92 points in its
first two games? Let's be brutally honest here: If the Lions can't beat these
guys, whom are they supposed to beat?
  And where is the improvement?  First the offense stinks, then the defense
stinks, then the offense stinks again. Who knows? Maybe Rusty Hilger and
Darryl Rogers are on their way back, too.
  QUESTION: What was the worst play in  Sunday's game?
  A. When Robert Clark let a Peete bomb go right between  his hands.
  B. When Johnson finally caught a pass, he got hit and fumbled it away.
  C. Impossible to answer.
  The correct  response is C. It would be unfair to choose just one.
  Peete? OK. Let's talk Peete. I like Rodney. I think he'll be a great
quarterback one day. But on Sunday, he reminded me of that rookie pitcher  in
the movie "Bull Durham." Sometimes he threw a strike, and sometimes he hit the
mascot.
  "It's not like I was trying to throw bad passes," Peete said.
Unfortunately, he often succeeded. He was 15-of-30  with an interception and a
sore knee when Fontes finally benched him in the third quarter. To be honest,
I'm not sure it was the smartest move to debut Peete in the first place. His
knee was tender,  he'd  had only three full practices, and the stretch offense
had finally jelled with Gagliano (27 points versus the Bears). The Lions also
knew Barry Sanders might not play because of  injury.
  You  stick a green quarterback out there with no run support? I don't buy
it. If the point is to win games, then the Lions may have had a better chance
starting Gagliano. But Fontes seemed in a gold miner's  rush to get Peete into
action. It backfired, and Peete spent the final 20 minutes on the bench, his
head low.
  Which, of course, was better than watching. Gagliano, who got married last
week, came  in and proved the theory that behind every good man is a woman --
and behind every Lions quarterback is someone dancing with his interception.
Team without a home
  OK. Stop. A moment of optimism.  The truth is 1) Peete will get better and
2) Sanders was hurt. If we've learned one thing over these past four weeks it
is that the Lions with Barry Sanders are a team with hope, and the Lions
without  Barry Sanders are Zsa Zsa Gabor.
  So next week may indeed be better than this week, even though next week's
opponent is Minnesota. In Minnesota. I mean, how much worse can it get?
  "Good players  make good plays, great players make great plays," Fontes
said. "And we didn't make any plays."
  Gosh. That's almost poetry.
  Unfortunately, it's a sad refrain. No worse than hearing "Let's Go
Steelers!" chants from the Silverdome end zone. Once again, we lost our
stadium to outsiders and, until the Lions improve, they can have it.
  "We got to get the winning taste in our mouth," said Brown, pacing  with
frustration, "we got to spit out this losing taste."
  Take aim, Lomas. The way the offense looked Sunday, you might miss the
sidewalk completely.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
