<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
8802220731
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
881130
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Wednesday, November 30, 1988
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL CHASER
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1D
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1988, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
PUCKISH WINGS TOY WITH OUR EMOTIONS
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
I  have to admit the Red Wings perplex me. I walk into their locker room
feeling partly like an old friend and partly like a parole officer. Hockey
players have always been, in my mind, the nicest  athletes to deal with; maybe
that's why, when bad news rises, you sort of feel like  the only sober guy at
a great party.

  Tuesday night was my first Wings game this season -- but not my first Wings
 column. I had already written about Petr Klima, when he was charged again
with  drunken  driving. I had already covered the press conference  in which
Jacques Demers and Jimmy Devellano announced, unenthusiastically,  the return
of troubled Bob Probert.

  Over the weekend, right wing Joe Kocur was charged with assault on a Boston
woman he met in a bar. I know Kocur, like him, always got along with him. On
Tuesday  I had to ask him what the story was, and he had to tell me his lawyer
had advised him against speaking.
  You may not believe this, but muckraking isn't every journalist's idea of a
good time. Personally,  I'd much rather yack about music, politics, or the
occasional flying octopus. It beats questions like, "Did you really do it?"
"Are you sorry?" and "How much time do you think you'll get in jail?"
  And yet I entered the locker room Tuesday aware that Probert was again a
tinderbox, and that Klima faces two separate court hearings on Friday, and, of
course, the Kocur deal, and so I was ready for  serious talk. I was ready for
controversy. I put my bag down and made the rounds.
  On my way out, I picked up my bag and slung it over my shoulder. Several
players and the physical therapist, Jim Pengelly,  were standing nearby,
smiling.
  "Pretty heavy?" Pengelly asked.
  "I think I'm just getting weaker," I said.
  "Nah, it's probably getting heavier," he said.
  I didn't think much  about it. And an hour later, up in the press box, when
I opened the bag to search for a notebook, I found seven hockey pucks stuffed
inside. Someone had slipped them in when I wasn't looking.
  Now,  how can you get mad at a team like that?
Real trouble; good hockey 
  Here are some scenes from Tuesday night:
* Probert, who is back after his alcohol problems -- but supposedly not
talking to the  press -- decides, for his own purposes, to do a TV interview
with Channel 9 from Windsor. The regular writers and TV guys, who have been
snubbed by Probert constantly, shake their heads and walk away.
* Steve  Yzerman breaks away and sizzles a shot into the corner of the net.
The crowd roars.
* Kocur, who does not dress for the game, watches from the Wings' suite, his
lawyer with him. He is mum about the  assault charges but admits that he is
bothered and pledges to change his social life.
* Gerard Gallant, after a night of near-misses, slaps the clinching goal into
an empty  net with 25 seconds left.  The crowd roars.
  This is the emotional ricochet you get with the Red Wings. If you want
trouble, you can find trouble; if you want good hockey, wonderful, inspiring
personalities, you can find that,  too.
  The other night, when Probert returned to the ice, the home crowd cheered
--  even though the last time Probert played, he and five teammates were
recovering from a night of drinking that soiled  the Red Wings' reputation.
  Cheering? I thought about Dick Young, the old New York sports writer who,
last year, wrote a column the day Mets pitcher Dwight Gooden was to return
from cocaine rehab.  The headline read: "Stand up and boo." "If I could
choreograph things tonight,"  Young wrote, "I would do it this way: Enter
Dwight Gooden. . . . 50,000 people boo loudly. That's to let him know how
society feels . . . about the damage he committed to millions of kids who
worshiped him. . . . "
  Nobody listened, of course. They cheered Gooden anyway. Dick Young died not
long after that. I don't  know if his ideas were right or wrong. I guess it
depends on what you want from sports.
  Somewhere in the first period Tuesday, I went out for some food. In line, I
glanced at the TV screen and saw  Gallant flat on the ice with New York's Jeff
Norton draped over him, fighting, swinging -- the referees just standing
there. It looked almost comical. A man in a red cap was watching the screen
alongside  me.
  "Great game, huh!" he shrieked. "Wow!"
A terrific, imperfect team
  So I confess a certain dichotomy now to the whole hockey experience. There
was a time, a couple of  years ago, when I drove  new coach Jacques Demers to
a playoff game, and the Wings won, and we did it again, and they won again,
and it became a good luck thing and we had a blast and they kept winning all
the way to the semifinals.
  It seemed so simple then. It doesn't  anymore. Detroit's hockey fun is
laced with fire now, its good times haunted by bad shadows. Demers is no
longer as happy-go-lucky -- he can't be -- and the players  speak freely on
some subjects, and on others, reply: "Don't talk to me about that; get
somebody else."
  Here is the sad truth: The Red Wings are a terrific bunch, but they're not
all perfect. Some  may be real trouble, and you can't call them Cinderella
anymore. But you keep going back, I guess, because you hope the good moments
will outweigh the bad. And in these heavy news times, it's about all  you can
do.
  By the way, whoever put the pucks in my bag. . . . 
  Very funny.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
