<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9201010060
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
920102
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Thursday, January 02, 1992
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
NWS
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1A
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>
Photo Color MARY SCHROEDER
</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>


:
U-M's Corwin Brown (20) and Deon  Johnson appear dejected on
the sidelines during the Wolverines'  34-14 loss Wednesday to
Washington."I can't imagine there being a better football team
than this one," Michigan coach Gary Moeller said  of
Washington.   "But I also thought we'd do better than we did."
</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1992, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
WOLVERINES GET WALLOPED
MICHIGAN FINDS NO PLACE TO HIDE;
HUSKIES MAKE CASE FOR BEING BEST
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
PASADENA, Calif. --  Couldn't run. Couldn't pass. Couldn't call in sick.

  Since that covered all their options, the Michigan Wolverines had no
choice but to stay on the field for the entire  Rose Bowl on Wednesday
afternoon, a game that, for U-M fans, was as much fun as an airplane full of
terrorists. Bad? This was bad. This made Bo's Rose Bowls look good, that's how
bad it was. When they  weren't being tackled for losses, the Wolverines were
being pushed aside for touchdowns, and when they weren't being pushed aside
for touchdowns,  they were being smothered on pass routes. So complete  was
the dominance of the Washington Huskies, that Michigan appeared to play the
entire game inside a paper bag. That wasn't a gun you heard to end this thing;
that was Washington, making a fist and going pop!

  "Were they the best team you've played this season?" someone asked coach
Gary Moeller, after the Wolverine's worst ever bowl loss, a 34-14 New Year's
stuffing.
  "This season?" he said.  "That's one of the best teams I've ever seen."
  Give him credit for spotting the obvious. If not for a few bad breaks, the
Huskies could have pocketed this game by halftime. They spent more time  in
the Michigan backfield than most of the Wolverine running backs. And they more
than doubled the Wolverines offensive output -- both in points and in yardage.
I know Washington came into this game  ranked No. 2 in the AP poll, while
Michigan was No. 4. Sorry. That's not two digits'  worth of difference.
Someone's getting too much credit, or someone's not getting enough.
  "I'd say they're the  national champions for sure," said U- M quarterback
Elvis Grbac, who got to know the Huskies on a first-name basis when they were
lying on top of him. "They're excellent. They're 10 times better than  Florida
State or Notre Dame."
  Of course, Washington doesn't care about those teams. It only cares about
Miami, its rival for the national crown in the polls. All across America this
morning, sports  nuts will enjoy their first argument of 1992: Who is better,
the purple or the orange?
  You know what? I'll show you a Michigan coaching staff and 95 players that
couldn't care less. 
Not the same  team
  This is no way to end a season, coming out to California and doing a bad
impersonation of yourself. Washington was good, but were the Wolverines really
this bad? By halftime Wednesday, fans  back home must have been adjusting the
color on their TV sets.
  "Those can't be maize-and-blue uniforms," you  could hear them say. "Do we
have the right station?"
  Good question. After all,  since when does Michigan lack a running game
(72 yards total)? Since when did they forget how to punt? Since when does
Grbac have trouble completing a simple pass? Since when does Desmond Howard
only  touch the ball twice on offense -- and never for points? Not only was
this the first time since his sophomore season that Howard didn't score a
touchdown -- a record of 14 games in a row, snapped --  but he also suffered
the indignity of being impersonated by Washington receiver Mario Bailey, who
did a Heisman pose in the end zone after scoring a 38-yard touchdown in the
fourth quarter.
  "What  did you think of Mario's pose?" someone asked Howard afterward.
  "I think he can come over to my house and see the real trophy anytime he
wants," he said,  laughing.
  It was the only laugh Michigan  had all afternoon.
  Not that you could fault Howard. He was busy racing downfield while all
the damage was being done at the line of scrimmage. Led by the Outland and
Lombardi Trophy winner Steve Emtman, the Washington defensive line swarmed
over anything that moved in the U-M backfield. They didn't just stop the
Wolverines; they gulped them.
  Want an example? Second quarter: Washington throws  an interception, and
Michigan takes over on the Huskies' 29-yard line. At this point, the game is
still close --  Washington 13, Michigan 7 --  and Wolverines fans are
screaming "THIS IS IT! THIS IS  OUR CHANCE!"
  Not exactly. On first down, the Huskies swarmed Grbac the way dogs swarm
the first piece of meat. Sack. Minus 12 yards.
  On second down, they swarm Grbac again. Sack. Minus three yards.
  On third down -- and by now, you need binoculars to see the end zone --
Tyrone Wheatley takes a handoff and is smothered. No gain.
  Congratulations. In three plays, the Wolverines almost made it back to
midfield.
  "We couldn't block them, we couldn't run on them, and we couldn't
establish any kind of rhythm," Moeller moaned. He's right. Washington
established the rhythm in this game.  It went thump-thump-thump-thump  . . . 
  . . . squash.
Welcome to the Rose Bowl
  And so begins Moeller's era in the Rose Bowl, a traditional burial ground
for Michigan teams in January. This  was his first loss at Pasadena, and at
one point, he was standing on the sidelines, his mouth in a frown, one hand
cupped under his chin, a la Jack Benny. I'm not sure what he was thinking, but
I have  a clue. Something like: "You know, Bo said there'd be days like this .
. ."
  In Moeller's defense, it wasn't often that Schembechler's team faced a No.
1 team as its Pac-10 opponent. Washington would  beat most schools in the
country, maybe all of them. That's in Moeller's defense. On the other hand, I
was a little surprised to hear Grbac say afterward: "I don't know if our
preparation was everything  it should have been. All these awards took guys
out of practice. And we inserted all these new plays that we were trying to
learn this week. We never really adjusted to it. . . . You come out here, and
there's all these distractions. . . ."
  Now, that could just be his frustration talking.  After all, Grbac spent
more time under the Huskies defense than he did reading it. And he was playing
with  a new center, Matt Elliot, whose inexperience at the position led to at
least four blown snap counts.
  But it certainly plays into that old Schembechler paranoia about too many
distractions, etc.,  etc.  You wonder if Howard's Heisman hype ate into the
traditional focus of this team.
  Ah well. It's all behind now. Let Washington and Miami fight it out over
this make-believe honor of being  the best in the nation. Michigan had a very
good season, with some terrific highlights -- anyone who forgets Howard's
catch against Notre Dame is suffering from selective memory -- and to say it
was ruined by this poor showing is to place too great an emphasis on these
games that are played six weeks removed from the regular season.
  Maybe senior lineman Greg Skrepanek, who has played in three  of these
Rose Bowls, summed it up best: "We were not the least bit embarrassed," he
said, "but we did play terrible."
  Well put.
  Unfortunately.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
U-M; COLLEGE; FOOTBALL; ROSE BOWL
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
