<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9301050359
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
930204
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Thursday, February 04, 1993
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
NWS
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1A
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1993, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
THE GAME STRETCHES IT INTO A DOUBLE STANDARD
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
Nine winters ago, Jesse Jackson, who was running for president, referred
to Jews as "Hymies" and New York as "Hymie Town." This is an ethnic slur. He
made it to a Washington Post reporter, but  when the story broke, Jackson
denied ever saying such a thing. A week later, he said he couldn't remember
saying it. A week later, he admitted saying it, but claimed it was in private
conversation. Then  he promised never to make such derogatory remarks again.

  I have been trying for days to figure how this is different than what
Marge Schott is accused of doing. I can't. But Schott, too stubborn  to
apologize, now loses control of her Cincinnati Reds for a year, and antes up a
$25,000 fine. And the man clapping hands the loudest and calling for even more
punishment is Jesse Jackson. This only  shows that Jackson, like many of us,
has a selective memory.

  So, apparently, does baseball. Now, I do not like Marge Schott, never did;
she has a history of cheap and insensitive behavior to anything  besides her
dogs. But anyone who thinks she owns the market on baseball bigotry needs
better TV reception in his cave.
  Hey, folks. This is a sport full of black and Hispanic superstars, yet it
has no black or Hispanic owners, no black general managers, and only five
minority managers, one of whom works for the Reds, Schott's team. In this way,
Schott is actually way ahead of 13 owners who have  never  had a minority in
charge of their clubs, and, truth be told, never will. These men have, I
promise you, made comments in private conversations that were no better than
Schott's poison tongue.  Her mistake was taking her mouth public with a
lawsuit filed by a disgruntled employee. And not apologizing quickly -- or
sincerely --  enough.
  Now she's out. And baseball is congratulating itself  on its newfound
sensitivity. This, of course, is the same game that smiled while Ted Turner,
who owns the Atlanta Braves, did the Tomahawk Chop night after night, on
network TV, while dozens of American  Indians protested just outside the
stadium. This is the sport that allows Steve Howe, a seven-time failure at its
drug policy, to take another try.
  So I look at this decision by the executive council, claiming it is for
"the good of the game," and I look at how many owners have long despised
Schott and would be happy to see her gone, and I look at how many are afraid
that a racial boycott, which Jackson  had threatened, might cost them money,
and I can't help but wonder if this very self-righteous punishment -- "There
should be no question that the type of language commonly used by Mrs. Schott
is offensive  and unacceptable. There is simply no place for this in major
league baseball," said Bud Selig, chairman of the council -- is not, at the
very least, a tad hypocritical.
It's time for real change 
  Hey, wouldn't it be better to change the hiring practices of this sport?
If you really want to improve things, force Schott to institute a percentage
of front office minority hires, same ratio of  minorities she has hitting home
runs and pitching shutouts for her team. This, at least, would lead to change.
  Good idea? Forget it. The other owners don't want anything that concrete,
because sooner  or later, they would have to comply as well.  No, most of
them will never be caught. They'll make their ethnic slurs in private, the way
most of us do. They are not as dumb as Schott, they figure.  So make her
suffer. Slice her up. Look stern in your admonishment. Then go back to the
smoke-filled rooms and make sure the doors are locked.  Remember Calvin
Griffith, a chubby-faced, foot-in- the-mouth  owner if there ever was one?
Back in the '70s, he made the comment that he moved his team, the Twins, from
Washington,  D.C., to Minnesota because there were "too many blacks" in D.C.,
and they didn't  pay to see baseball games. Had he said this today, I guess
Griffith would be selling pencils on the street corner.
  Instead, nothing happened. Like Jackson, Griffith was never punished.
Never paid  a fine, or lost control of his affairs. Times have changed. But
bigotry has not. Especially not in private conversations.
  It goes on. 
  It goes on and on.
Private words, public costs 
  So,  believe it or not, we have just witnessed a small but amazing moment
in the history of this country built on free speech: Private conversations
being held against you. The Schott decision may feel good,  make you feel like
some sort of justice was done. But we had better be very careful of making
private comments a reason for public punishment. Our courts don't have the
room for it. And if you are really  being fair about this -- and that's what
this is all about, isn't it, being fair? -- then everyone, not just rich
people, not just owners of sports teams, but everyone who has ever uttered a
Polish joke,  made a crack about "cheap Jews," or done a mean imitation of the
Chinese waiter, is in danger of saying bye-bye for a while.
  Do you pass the test?
  I have no problem saying what Marge Schott did  was wrong. I'm just not
sure  it's special. Was it a case of too much attention paid? Did she simply
make it so obvious it couldn't be ignored? After all, nobody minded Al
Campanis' obvious racism until  he displayed it on ABC-TV.
  Or is it simply that the other owners circled their wagons and made a call
that was good for them, the hell with Schott? They talk about "the best
interests of baseball,"  but I ask myself how the sport can get so indignant
about remarks made by a foolish owner, yet condone its poor minority hiring
record, or sexual assault charges against its players, or the return of Howe,
a seven-time loser? You mean that stuff is OK for baseball's image?
  Morality is not something used when it serves your purposes. If Schott's
dismissal truly makes people less racist, less  bigoted, well, no one could be
happier. But if all it does is get rid of an embarrassment, and allow everyone
from Ted Turner to Jesse Jackson to live comfortably with their own
hypocrisies, well, then,  I don't see how we accomplished a whole lot here.
Sorry, but I really don't.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
COLUMN; RACISM; BASEBALL; MARGE SCHOTT; SPT; FINE; MONEY; PENALTY
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
