<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9101260321
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
910630
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, June 30, 1991
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1F
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1991, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
BASEBALL IGNORANCE IS BLISS AT A DISTANCE
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
LONDON --  Ah, England. My favorite place to watch baseball.

  "Baseball?" you say. "They don't have baseball over there." 

  You are correct. They also don't have cursing at umpires, free  agency,
domed stadiums or Rickey Henderson. 
  They don't have players driving drunk.  They don't have agents moaning "$3
million a year is an insult to my client."
  All they have on baseball is  what you find on the back pages of the
British newspapers: the scores from two days ago, and the standings.
  You know what? You could fall in love with the game all over again.
  I call it the magic  of distance. If you've ever been overseas with U.S.
sports fan, you know what I mean. It's like plucking a fish out of water and
placing it on a table. First it lies still, in a state of shock. Then  it
starts to thrash.
  So it goes with the U.S. sports fan. First, he lands in London or Paris.
Then he finds his hotel. Then he goes to sleep.
  Then he wakes up screaming. 
  "SCORES! WHERE ARE  THE SCORES? MY GOD, RITA, THIS TV MUST BE BROKEN!"
Fan withdrawal 
  Suddenly, his whole world has changed. Yesterday he had ESPN; now he has
cricket. Yesterday, he had touchdowns, rebounds, the Heisman  Trophy ballot;
now he has cricket.
  He begins to sweat. He goes through withdrawal. He misses Bob Costas. He
dreams of Nike commercials. Soon, the smallest niblet of sports news looms
like a juicy  steak. And he must have it.
  Years ago, in a Swiss cafe, I saw two Americans fight over a week-old
"Sports Illustrated." Once, on a Greek island, a Texas man begged me for the
Dallas Mavericks' second-round  draft pick.  In Pamplona, Spain, a Michigan
tourist grilled me on the Tigers.
  "I hear Lou Whitaker went 2-for-3 the other night," he said excitedly.
  Two-for-3? Lou Whitaker? Who cares? If the  man were in Detroit, that would
mean as much to him as where he left his socks.
  But overseas? Something happens. Sports becomes your link to home, your shot
of identity, a reminder that somewhere,  far away, your old life is safe,
cradled in the roar of the crowd. You forget the bad. You remember the good.
  The magic of distance.
Reading the fine print 
  And if you ask me, that's the best  way to watch baseball these days. Let's
face it. We are clobbered by the game. It comes at us at least 30 times a day,
between local news, network news, ESPN and highlight shows. Statistics fall
like rain, soaking the fantasy league geeks who have nothing else in their
lives but Danny Tartabull's batting average.
  The actual games, too damn long to begin with, are broadcast and
rebroadcast. We  know how many votes separate the All-Star candidates, we know
who's coming back from drug rehab, we know whose groin is pulled.
  We know too much. We should try some distance.  Here, in England, for
example, this is all you get on Thursday's Tigers game: a tiny box score that
says "Milwaukee 9, Detroit 3." And underneath, where they mention home runs
only -- singles and doubles are not important  enough -- there is this:
"Tettleton (13)."  No details. No explanations.
  As I read it, my imagination was awakened.  I wondered about that (13). Was
it over the roof? Was it a solo shot? Did it come  on the first pitch?
  I saw Tettleton in my mind, the crack of the bat, the long, beautiful arc
of the ball. I imagined some kid, holding his glove out in the bleachers.
Because I had not watched the replay 200 times -- with some announcer
screaming "BOOM!" -- the picture was somehow fresher, sweeter. It was my own.
  Once upon a time, this is how baseball was in America. Mothers kept score,
listening  to the afternoon radio and scribbling in oversized score books.
When the kids came home from school, they pored over the penciled markings,
they dreamt about their heroes, what might happen tomorrow.
 The game was not a soap opera, not a police blotter, not high finance. It was
simply a game. And, for most people, it was far away.
  Which was part of its magic.
  We could use some of that today,  in all our sports, in football,
basketball, hockey. For the next few weeks, I will get it in baseball. I will
follow the game long-distance. I will pore through the small print. I will see
the action  only in my mind.
  I will be blissfully ignorant of expansion, contract negotiations and Jose
Canseco. I will not talk to anyone in a fantasy league.
  "Won't you find that frustrating?" I hear you  ask.
  You know what I think? I think I'll like the game a whole lot more when I
come back. That's what I think.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
