<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9202030782
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
920913
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, September 13, 1992
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1F
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1992, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
SHAME ON US FOR BETRAYING THE TRUTH
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
NEW YORK --  I promise to tell the truth in this column.

  But am I lying?

  Or do you just think I'm lying? Do you figure, "Well, he says he'll tell
the truth, but you know newspaper guys. They're just trying to sell papers."
  If so, you're no different from most Americans in this election year. You
don't expect the truth. You haven't heard the truth in a long time. Heck, you
might not recognize  the truth if it jumped up and offered you "free cash
prizes!" -- since whenever that happens, we assume someone's lying, right?
  Nowadays the truth is disposable, like a candy wrapper. There are so  many
lies out there, tossing one more on the pile hardly seems noticeable.
  So we have a president who had the audacity to say, "Read my lips, no new
taxes!" -- then raised taxes anyhow. Now he comes  back four years later and
says, "I raised taxes once, but I will never do it again. Never, ever!"
  And we're supposed to believe the words "Never, ever" somehow carry more
truth than "Read my lips."
  Or do we just assume he's lying?
Lies become monsters 
  We see Ronald Reagan on network TV, raising his actor's voice about the
"the importance of family values," yet we know his own children  barely talk
to him; they write books about what lousy parents he and Nancy were. Do we
just assume Reagan is lying?
  And Bill Clinton says in a campaign speech Friday, "I want an America that
values  families" -- yet a few months ago, he was involved in that Gennifer
Flowers mess, hardly the stuff that keeps families together.
  Do we figure he's lying, too?
  Here in New York, there is an incredible  story developing. A 74-year-old
former congressman named Mario Biaggi, who went to prison for accepting
bribes, is running for Congress again. He was released last year -- after
serving only 26 months  of an eight-year sentence -- because, supposedly, his
health was bad. Heart problems. His doctors said he might die under prison
conditions.
  But suddenly, Biaggi, a free man, is walking around as  if 20 years
younger. He is shaking hands and making promises. He told a New York Times
reporter, "The campaign has nourished me" to health. He said this while eating
fried potatoes and a cheese omelet,  a logical choice for a man with deadly
heart trouble, right?
  Biaggi -- who was convicted of taking nearly $2 million in bribes --
refuses to even acknowledge that he spent time in the slammer, referring  to
it only as "when I was away." It is an increasingly common form of lying in
this country: Simply ignore the truth. Don't say it. Don't speak the words,
and somehow it will go away. So Clinton doesn't  say the words "draft dodge"
and Bush doesn't say the words "savings and loan scandal," and somehow it all
goes bye-bye. It's like the kid who puts his hands over his eyes and says, "If
I can't see the  monster, then he can't see me."
  These are people we elect to rule us?
  Why don't we demand higher standards?
Trust disappears 
  The answer is, because our standards have been lowered everywhere.  The
lie is expected. We go to buy a used car, and we cringe when the salesman
approaches, because we know that he'll pelt us with lies to make a sale.
  We get letters that begin "YOU HAVE WON A MILLION  DOLLARS" and we throw it
in the trash, uninterested. A lie. We see ads for "cheap" airfares, then spot
the small print and don't bother reading. A lie.
  We hold up heroes who are largely myth, like  actors and rock 'n' roll
stars, who tell us how much they love their current husband or wife (a lie --
they divorce six months later) or how great their new project is (a lie --  it
stinks). We have  Woody Allen and Mia Farrow -- who were glorified for years
by the media for their "special" relationship --  now admitting it was all a
lie, and accusing each other over as horrific a subject as child  abuse.
  These are our heroes? Actors? Athletes who promise "loyalty" ? Business
shams like Donald Trump and Leona Helmsley? You think of some of the biggest
stories of recent months, and they center  around lies: the Clarence Thomas
hearings, the Kennedy rape trial, the savings and loan scandals.  
  If you ask me, the reason for this proliferation of untruth is simple:
There is no shame left  in our country -- and shame is traditionally the only
weapon to defeat lies. In some ancient societies, getting caught in a
falsehood destroyed the honor of a family. Who would dare try it?
  But  today, getting caught just elicits a smart-aleck reply like, "So I
lied. Sue me." Or worse, "I had to lie to get what I wanted."
  No shame. And for some reason, we accept this as a reasonable attitude  in
this country. As long as we do, that's exactly the kind of leaders we're going
to get.
  And that's the truth.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
