<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9302040024
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
930919
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, September 19, 1993
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1F
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1993, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
EVERYBODY'S A CRITIC WHO LOVED THAT  FILM
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
Today's column will be A WINNER!  It will be THE SURPRISE HIT OF THE FALL!

  It has BLOCKBUSTER WRITTEN ALL OVER IT!

  It is THE FUNNIEST COLUMN I'VE READ ALL YEA--
  Sorry. You caught me  practicing. I have decided to give up my current line
of work,  which is, well, I'm not sure, whatever it is, and go into movie
reviewing.
  I don't mean the long, gracefully written reviews Pauline Kael  did in the
New Yorker. Or the serious criticism found in the New York Times, Boston
Globe, or this newspaper.
  I mean the stuff that gets used in movie ads, stripped across the top. 
  You  know the lines I'm talking about.
  "RUN AND SEE IT!"
  "A ROCK 'EM, SOCK 'EM THRILLER!"
  "THE BIGGEST HIT OF THE '90s!"
  Now, I don't mind seeing these quotes for an obviously well-made  film,
such as "Scent of a Woman"  or "Beauty and the Beast."  
  What puzzles me is seeing  the  same praise atop ads for "Weekend at
Bernie's II."
  In fact, no matter how bad the movie, the studios  seem able to locate some
shill willing to slap a good word on it. From bad comedy to bad action films
to bad horror films with names like  "Buzzsaw III: The Beheading" ("IT'LL
KNOCK YOUR BLOCK OFF!")
  Who are these people?
  And how do I get their jobs?
The reviews of the year 
  Well, a little research, particularly a collection of reviews in Variety
magazine, shows a disturbing pattern amongst often-quoted film critics. 
  In fact, the word "critic" might be too kind.  After all, if you can call
"Sommersby"  the "best romance since Gone with the Wind," how critical can
you be?
  But  this is exactly what Pat Collins, from New York TV station WWOR did.
In fact, Collins --  whose name should really be spelled "COLLINS!"  --  has
been spotted all over movies ads this year. And why not,  with her "criticism"
of:
* "In the Line of Fire" --  "The best action movie of the summer."
* "Hard Target" --  "The fastest nonstop action movie of the summer."
* "Free Willy" --  "The best buddy  movie of the summer."
* "Sleepless in Seattle" --  "The surprise hit of the summer."
  Whew. That was some summer, Pat.
  Pat also called "Posse" -- a pretty awful movie by most accounts --  "The
Wild Bunch of the '90s!" And that's tame compared to a guy named Michael
Wilmington of the LA Times, who wrote of "Posse":  "A big, rousing,
hip-hopping, trash-talking, dynamite-lobbing, all-stops-out,  rock the house
comic/epic Western."
  Whoa, slow down, cowboy. I'm exhausted.
  Often, when you see amazing quotes atop awful movies, they come from small
radio or TV stations, or individuals who syndicate themselves.  The name Jeff
Craig, from "Sixty Second Preview" may be familiar to movie fans who took his
advice on "Cliffhanger" --  "A True Blockbuster!" -- and  "Last Action Hero"
--  "A  Grade A Blockbuster."
  Never mind that both films were panned by an overwhelming majority of
critics and customers. To Jeff, they were blockbusters, and that got him atop
many a large ad.
  Which  may be what this is all about.
Getting top billing 
  While many  will not admit it, it's a coup in the movie reviewing business
when an ad blasts your name above names like Schwarzenegger, Stallone  and Van
Damme. And for small reviewers and syndicated programs that make more money
with each new station that buys them,  recognition may be more important
than standards.
  Besides, these same  reviewers are often flown by the studios, free of
charge, to "junkets,"  where they are treated to free hotel rooms, free meals,
free parties, and a chance to chat with the stars after screening the  film.
The studios do this in hopes of good reviews. If you keep slamming their
films, you are not likely to  be asked back, especially if you are a small
operation. It would be like asking a party guest to urinate on your carpet.
  So we get reviewers like Jim Ferguson of KMSB, who declared "Hot Shots!
Part Deux" was "Easily the summer's funniest comedy!" even  though his review
was on May 21.  And Gary Franklin of KCOP saying  "Amos and Andrew"  is "the
funniest movie I've seen all year," even though he said this in February.
  Some studios even ask reviewers for "a line" about a movie before they've
written their review. And the reviewers give them a line, then work it in
later. I'm not kidding here.
  You know what? I can do this. 
  I can. I know I can. And  I'm gonna.  Right  after I sit on my couch, eat
popcorn, and watch "Animal House."  Which, as we know, is THE GREATEST FILM
EVER MADE.
  How'm I doin'?
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
MOVIE; REVIEW; CRITICISM; COLUMN
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
