<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9202040779
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
920920
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, September 20, 1992
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1F
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1992, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
U-M TRIO PINCHED BY OBSOLETE RULES
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
I had a friend who went to college on a full music scholarship. In the
summers, he would tour with rock bands, make good money, then come back and
continue his studies.

  No one saw anything wrong  with that.

  But the NCAA would.
  If you've been following the events of the last month, you know that three
Michigan basketball players, Chris Webber, Jalen Rose and Eric Riley, have
gotten in  hot water for taking money at basketball clinics.
  Never mind that their coaches told them it was OK to do the clinics. Never
mind that one of the clinics was for charity.
  Never mind that we're  talking $300 apiece. Or that we're talking two
clinics total.
  Never mind that basketball will be the chosen careers for these three young
men, just as music was for my college friend.
  Never  mind all that. The NCAA got word of this clinic stuff and began to
shuffle papers, and Michigan, in turn, began to shuffle papers, and observers
began to wring their hands over the future of academics  and athletics, and
next thing you know, Rose, Webber and Riley are declared ineligible.
  And once again, we have to wonder what is going on in the world of college
sports, and can't somebody there  take a course in common sense?
NCAA living in the past
  Under NCAA rules, college athletes are not allowed to work in their fields
while on scholarship. If a basketball player were paid to play  in a summer
league -- wham! He's outta there. No more college ball.
  Right away, you see the hypocrisy. Would they tell my musician friend he
couldn't play in rock bands, that he had to wash dishes  instead?
  Ah, but sports are different. Sports are governed by the NCAA, which says
if an athlete is paid to play sports, he is no longer an amateur, and this
somehow violates a code of ethics. Maybe  it just violates the tax-exempt
status the NCAA enjoys with all those piles of money it makes from TV and
ticket sales. Whatever. These folks sure are confusing.
  Look at how many times they've changed  their rules. Not long ago, college
athletes weren't allowed to work at all; they had to scrounge to buy a pizza.
When this led to slimy boosters slipping $100 bills to players, the NCAA said
"OK. The  kids can work. But only under certain conditions."
  Not long ago, junior and sophomore players weren't allowed to enter the
NFL draft (this kept the kids in college, making big money for their
universities).  But when a few smart young athletes finally threatened
lawsuits, that rule was also changed.
  As eventually all these rules will change -- including the dumbo rules
about summer work. They will change  because they don't make sense. I know
some of us resent college athletes for getting rich and famous by dribbling a
ball, but that's not the issue here.
  The issue is fairness.
Don't blame Webber,  Rose, Riley
  Let's look at the terrible "crimes" committed by Webber, Rose and Riley.
They were asked to appear at a charity clinic to raise money for a sick child.
They were paid $300 apiece. Webber,  Rose and Rile are national stars; people
come out to get their autographs. Had the organizer tried to rent an NBA
player, he might have shelled out $10,000. Compared to that, $300 is a steal.
  But  the NCAA said, "Wait a second, $300 may be too much. The rules say you
can only make a reasonable amount for charity, educational or non-profit
appearances." What's reasonable? Nobody seems to know.
  Meanwhile, here is the second clinic violation: Webber, Rose and Riley all
appeared together. This threatens an idiotic NCAA rule about players using
clinics for team practice -- as if the three of  them were working on some
secret play to beat Duke next year. Come on. If they wanted to do that, they'd
do it any summer night in pick-up ball at the gym.
  And yet, this week, Michigan made Webber,  Rose and Riley ineligible until
the NCAA hands down its ruling. Of course, this, too, is a sham. They can
still practice. They can still go to school. Nothing is affected except games,
which don't start  until December -- and the case will be long over by then.
All Michigan did was score points with the NCAA by taking action themselves.
  If this all seems kind of stupid, that's because it is. College  sports
make thunderstorms of money from these athletes. Truth be told, there should
probably be a Desmond Howard Library or an Earvin Johnson Student Center on
campus, for all the dough they brought  in. 
  Instead, these athletes are dragged through a public flogging for trying to
do what we all did in college -- pick up a few bucks in our hoped-for careers.
  Meanwhile, the man who willingly  paid the U-M players the $300, when
asked if he did anything wrong, said: "If I did, I'm the biggest butt head
this side of the Mississippi."
  Only because the NCAA is in Kansas.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
