<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9202150746
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
921206
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, December 06, 1992
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1F
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1992, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
THE CHOICE IS CLEAR ON HELPING SOMALIA
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
Why should we?

  What compels us to go marching into Somalia now? Who do we think we are?

  Why must our sons and daughters, most of whom have never been anywhere near
Somalia, now risk their  lives to help straighten out its mess?
  Why should even one of them take a bullet?  And we all know more than one
of them will.  
  Why should we?
  Why does America pour countless millions  into trying to feed some distant
African nation, when people here at home are sleeping in the streets and
begging pennies for food?
  Why do we care about Somalia in the first place? We have little  history
with it. We are nowhere near it. We do not depend on it for oil, technology,
or trade. 
  Their people are not our people. Their ways are not our ways.  They are
mostly Muslims, and there are  other Muslim nations in the world. Why don't
they help their own? Why does it come to us?
  Why should we?
  How do we justify sending loved ones to a place where murder is hourly, and
law non-existent,  where there is no government, no authority, no rules, no
hope. Where food ships are shot at? Where relief workers are attacked? Where
warlords squeeze one side of the population while slaughtering the  other?
Where the most popular way of making money is offering "protection" services
to outsiders?
  Go there? Help them?
  Why should we?
It sounds familiar 
  Why burden the new Clinton administration  with a leech that could suck the
spirit out of Inauguration Day? Why start something we cannot finish? Everyone
knows that even if this "mission" is successful, eventually we will have to
leave, and  the chaos that turned Somalia into one big killing field could
return the moment we depart. Didn't we try this once in Vietnam? Didn't we try
this once in Korea? Haven't we learned our lesson?
  Why must we always jump in when things go wrong? Where is Britain, which so
far has promised no troops to this Somalia effort? Where is Germany, which, so
far, has put up no money?
  Where is Japan,  which thinks nothing of making a profit off the world, but
is typically slow to show nonprofit commitment? Why us and not them? 
  Why does the world cry our name when they need help, food, or protection,
then vilify us for being "imperialistic"? Won't that happen again here?
  What do we gain from involvement in Somalia? We could be there for months,
maybe years. We could paint ourselves into a corner.  We could lose our
soldiers in a desert land, lose equipment to terrorist attacks, and lose face
if it doesn't work out.
  Why should we?
  Why can't we turn out backs like most countries in the world?  Say, sorry,
it's a shame, but we have our own problems to deal with? We can't help
everyone. Why Somalia and not Sudan? Why Somalia and not Bosnia? There are
many places where people are starving. Many  places where the helpless are
ignored. Why there? Why now? Why us?
  Why should we?
  Here is the answer.
  Because we have no choice.
The alternatives 
  Because you cannot sit by while a nation  starves to death. Because you
cannot spew politics when children's bellies are swollen. Because you cannot
talk money when mothers weep and fathers take a gun in the head for trying to
reach a handful of food.
  Because if no one else will, we must. Because this is not about countries,
it's about the human race. I rarely quote George Bush in this column. I quote
him now: "We must help them live."
  Because we can.
  So while there is no assurance this relief effort will work, and while it
is not fair that America lead the way while others conveniently twiddle their
thumbs, and while it is wrong that anyone should die trying to deliver food,
 it still must be done, because the alternative is unthinkable.
  The alternative is to ignore the helpless. To go deaf to their wails of
hunger and  agony. If other nations do it, well, let them learn from our
example. As long as you are part of the haves, and innocent victims are part
of the have-nots, you cannot -- despite all political and military  theories
-- justify not helping.
  I say this with no joy. I say this with no patriotic music. I say this
knowing full well that were it me on that transport plane, I would be
trembling.
  I say  it anyhow: without mercy, you have no society. I take a simple pride
in living in a country that knows this is true.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>

</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
