<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9701130083
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
970504
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, May 04, 1997
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1F
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1997, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
GREAT ENDINGS? ROYKO WROTE THE BOOK ON 'EM
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
TO: Mike Royko

FROM: An admirer

  Dear Mr. Royko:

 
  Over the years, I have received many letters from readers. Quite a few
begin this way. "I've never written to a columnist before . . ." 

  Tell you the truth, Mr. Royko, neither have I. It took your death to get me
to write you now.

  I thought it was important, even if you can't read this letter, because
what you wrote in your column,  year after year in several Chicago newspapers,
was very good. It set a bar in this business. Few of us ever pulled our heads
as high as that bar, let alone our chins or elbows, but the effort was
important.  You inspired it.

  I had hoped to meet you when I was younger, when I read your collection
books until they were tattered and frayed at the edges. Then I made my way in
journalism, got a column of  my own and met people who knew you in Chicago.

  "What's he like?" I asked.

  Invariably, the answers were bad. "A grouch," some said. "A jerk," said
others.

  And I decided that meeting you might  shatter a certain picture I had in my
mind. I didn't want that. I didn't want anything spoiling the joy I felt in
reading your column, especially one of your "good ones."

  You know which ones I mean.  When you gave it to the bureaucrats, when you
exposed some nutty yuppie trend, when you exposed the justice system for what
it is -- a towering inferno of confusion.

  I remember one column where a  cab driver chased a guy who took off without
paying his fare. The cabbie tackled him, and the crook sued him for assault --
and won. I was infuriated when I read that. But that's what you wanted, isn't
it?

  You always found stories like that. Everyday people suffering everyday
lunacy. It's what we all should be doing in this business. Not writing about
things under our own roof, not contemplating  our navels. People. Real life.
In 40 years you never ran out of subjects. I wonder where all those people
will go now?

 

A pox on New Yorkers

  You never needed big words. You never forgot that buying  a newspaper does
not require a college degree. So you used no flowery phrases. No Shakespeare.
Despite that -- or maybe because of it -- your sentences always hit home.

  Like the way you described  your hometown, Chicago: "It was built by great
men who demanded that drunkards and harlots be arrested, while charging them
rent until the cops arrived."

  Or why you disliked New Yorkers, "most of  whom are intellectual con men,
professional wise guys, or self-pitying whiners. Furthermore, most of their
legendary cab drivers sound dumb."

  You loved endings; nobody did them better. You knew a  great column is like
a rainbow with a pot of gold at the bottom.

  So you wrote that advice column when Charles and Diana got married, a
serious piece right up to the last line: "Remember: squeeze  the toothpaste
from the bottom."

  Or the column about the right age to start drinking: "If they think they're
having fun, they're not old enough."

  Or, my favorite, the column about the thug named  Adolpho who had allegedly
raped a woman. Adolpho was a gang member. ("I'm not sure which gang," you
wrote, "The Insane Idiots, The Moronic Madmen.  . . . It doesn't make much
difference. A spray can  is a spray can.") Adolpho had a gold chain pierced
through his private part. And because the victim, in her trauma, could not
recall this chain, the man was set free.

  In your final line, you suggested  justice might only come if the price of
gold went up, and "a thief will grab Adolpho's gold chain and run like hell
with it."

  I still laugh when I read that.

 

A fitting tribute

  You were not  without your prejudices, but a columnist never is. You were,
at times, chauvinistic, pro-alcohol, anti- youth. But people knew where you
came from. You wrote how you felt, not what you thought people  wanted to
read.

  Like the time you wrote about John Belushi, who was an old family pal and
who called you "Uncle Mike." The night he died, you wrote a heartbreaking
column. And when people criticized you after his death was found to be
drug-related, you fired back. You stood by your friends.

  You dealt with crime, politics, sex -- even sports. I still have a column
you wrote about baseball, which  began: "A former New Yorker was talking to me
about how great the Yankees are, how they will win, blah, blah, blah, so I
told him to shut his big fat New York mouth."

  How could anyone not read the  second paragraph of that?

  You defined what a column should be -- not about the writer, but about the
subject, and the point. So I would like to leave you with a final
appreciation. And in the spirit  of your kicker endings, Mr. Royko, I try my
best right now:

  Anyone can fill up space in a newspaper. Very few can leave a hole.

  You will be missed.

  Yours truly,

  A Fan.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>
THIS ELECTRONIC VERSION MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THE PRINTED ARTICLE.
</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
MIKE ROYKO
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
