<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9701140441
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
970518
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, May 18, 1997
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1E
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1997, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
WHO ARE WE TO FORCE OUR SAD STANDARDS ON OTHERS?
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
This is how you know crime has sunk its teeth into your society. When
innocent people are branded as criminals -- because they weren't scared
enough.

Take the case of a Danish woman, Annette  Sorensen, who was visiting New
York City with her 14-month-old baby. She was having a meal with the child's
father, who lives in Brooklyn.

 
  They were at a Manhattan restaurant called Dallas BBQ. Sorensen  left her
baby in a stroller outside the window, while she and the father sat inside at
a table. 

  Now, this is not something I would do, and perhaps not something you would
do -- and we'll get to  why in a minute. But Sorensen is from Denmark, where,
she says, leaving your child outside a restaurant is not uncommon and is no
big deal. According to many Danes who have been interviewed in the past few
days, Sorensen is right.

  But it didn't go over well at the Dallas BBQ. A baby alone on the street is
going to draw attention in this country -- even in New York. And reportedly,
several waiters  and customers told Sorensen that her child was crying, and
she should do something about it.

  Of course, if she brought the baby inside and it was crying, they would
probably glare at her and tell  her to do something about it, too.

  But never mind that. Sorensen did not go outside and retrieve her baby. So
someone called the cops. And the next thing you know, the police were taking
the infant  away.

  Sorensen began to scream. The father got into a fight with the cops. The
couple were dragged off to jail for two nights, while the baby was put in
foster care.

  The charge was endangering  the welfare of a child.

  Welcome to America.

The way things were

  Now, anyone who says this case was handled correctly is 1) a police
brutality fan or 2) one of those self-righteous types who  thinks he was put
on Earth to tell others how to parent their children.

  I am not defending what Sorensen did. Having grown up in this country --
and having lived in New York City -- I doubt I would  even take a baby into
Manhattan if I could help it.

  But that's not the point. Common sense suggests that once the police
arrived, they could have calmly told Sorensen that she needed to keep the
baby with her, or else she might be charged with a crime. They could have told
the father, "Hey, you live in America. Tell her how it is. Or next time, you
could be arrested, too."

  I'm sure this  would have worked. It has to be better than throwing two
people in jail and sticking an infant in foster care. How is that the best
thing for the child? Two nights away from its mother?

  When the  court returned the baby to Sorensen Wednesday, it did so under
the condition that she be monitored, and that the father's home be visited.
The couple must go back to court this week and prove to a judge  they are
trustworthy parents.

  You should be scared by this, folks. We should all be scared by this. A
government that can take away your child so abruptly, and shackle you with
arbitrary parenting restrictions, is a government whose laws should be
questioned. I'm not trying to sound like some right-wing talk show host here.
But it's not so long ago that leaving a child in a car, or sleeping in  a
stroller, was something you saw in every town in America.

  Now we call the cops.

  "This is a nightmare," Sorensen said.

  Yes. But the real culprits were never charged.

No way to exist

  The real culprits are the perverts who would steal a child off the street,
the sickos who now have this whole nation afraid to blink, lest someone
disappear with its babies. We have become so inured  to these jerks that we
now get indignant when a mother dares to leave her child alone for a few
minutes. How could she do that? What kind of mother is she?

  But we are taking our anger out on the  wrong people. We are accepting this
war zone as a natural world. And now this woman -- with no history of crime,
no history of abuse, no history of anything except being careless by our
standards --  faces charges that could land her in jail. At one point, even
the Danish Embassy got involved, but withdrew over a question of diplomatic
immunity.

  How can anyone think this is normal? After this  incident, a New York Post
columnist criticized Sorensen, writing, "Those high-minded folks from
Scandinavia apparently have developed the world's first self-nurturing baby."

  What garbage. Just because  they're not as paranoid as New Yorkers?

  You know what I felt when I first read this story? Not anger. Not the right
to instruct this woman. Jealously. I was jealous that Sorensen came from a
place in this world where you didn't have to worry about some creep running
off with your kid.

  I'd like to live someplace like that. I really would.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>
THIS ELECTRONIC VERSION MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THE PRINTED ARTICLE.
</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
COLUMN
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
