<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9906060052
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
990606
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, June 06, 1999
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM; SUNDAY VOICES
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1E
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1999, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
WE ALL KNOW TRUTH ABOUT ENTERTAINMENT
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
Let's see. Our kids adore pro wrestling. They are mesmerized by gory video
games. They sing along to rap music that celebrates killing cops. They line up
every weekend for movies, from "Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace," in
which people shoot one another with lasers, to "The Matrix," in which almost
everyone is left bloody and dead.

Tell you what. I'm going to save the government some money. Instead of
following President Bill Clinton's "bold" move last week -- ordering a $1
million, 18-month government study on whether Hollywood markets violence to
children -- give me five bucks and listen very closely.

YES ...THEY ...DO!

There. Think of all the paperwork I saved. Not to mention the $999,995.

Clinton's ordering of a "probe" into the entertainment industry is like
sticking a thermometer into the sun. Why bother? The average American already
knows the answer. We may not grasp foreign affairs. We may not understand
interest rates. But we do know entertainment.

And in America, it often means violence.

The average American parent sees things like this every day: children making
"boom" sounds while playing with gun-toting action figures. Children
body-slamming friends with a move from the World Wrestling Federation.
Children hypnotized by video games in which warriors slice the heads off their
enemies.

Do we really need the Federal Trade Commission to tell us that the
entertainment business loves violence, and sells it to whomever buys it
regardless of age?

Of course not.

And that's the point.

A study of the obvious



Clinton has become the Zen master of what I call denture politics -- all
shine, no teeth. Remember the national dialogue on race. Did that change
anything in your neighborhood? Now, after Columbine High School, Clinton wants
to show he's responding to our pain. His heart may be in the right place. But
with Hollywood and violence, our president is once again chomping with all the
bite of a frog.

Oh sure, ordering a federal agency to investigate a problem -- like getting
seems like a serious move, until you see what's inside.

In truth, this 18-month probe will study the obvious, come back with the
obvious and report the obvious. By that point, the anger over recent high
school shootings will long be gone, as will the million dollars of our tax
money. Clinton will barely care, since 18 months from now, we'll have a new
president-elect.



In fact, by that point, Clinton will be boxing up souvenirs from the Oval
Office. And he might find photos of the myriad Hollywood types he has courted,
befriended and de-funded over the years. They paid to finance his election.
They slept in the Lincoln bedroom. They rallied when he behaved with the same
sexual morality as one of them, a casting director in a room full of desperate
starlets.

And this is how he thanks them? With an 18-month investigation?

Well. Come to think of it ...

It's yesterday's news already



Of course, after the tragedies in Colorado and Georgia, Clinton is not alone
in his finger-pointing. Parents blame schools; schools blame parents. Society
blames the gun lobby; the gun lobby blames society.

And everyone blames the entertainment industry. And why not? Bloody violence
has so saturated this business, they should change "fade to black" to "fade to
red." Rap is frequently about violence. Wrestling is about violence. Teen
slasher movies are about violence. "Jerry Springer" is about violence.

Let's face it. Violence doesn't infect entertainment. It is entertainment.

And of course, in typical fashion, those getting rich off this business deny
charges of pandering to the worst in human nature. They say, "If people didn't
want it, they wouldn't buy it."

But the great unspoken axiom to that sentence is this: "If it wasn't offered,
they would buy something else."

Be honest. Americans always will seek entertainment. And many will go to the
lowest common denominator. But eliminate the crude and rude, raise the level a
bit, and there'll be no outcry. Viewers will simply watch the less offensive
material.

So when entertainment moguls such as Edgar Bronfman Jr., head of Universal
Studios, complain that teen violence is a societal problem, not an
entertainment problem, they are lying, and they know it. What they're saying
is that violence is a societal problem -- and they have every right to make a
fortune off it.

And when Clinton claims he's taking action with this probe, he's also lying.
Because he knows this report will fade quicker than Pauly Shore's movie
career.

In the end, our kids-and-violence problem boils down to this: It's not about
who started it; it's about who'll do something to fix it.

I got five bucks that says nobody

volunteers.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>
THIS ELECTRONIC VERSION MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THE PRINTED ARTICLE.
</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
COLUMN
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
