<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9701170206
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
970615
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, June 15, 1997
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1E
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1997, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
IF STOCKS ARE IN CLOVER, THEN WHY AREN'T WE?
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
These days, there are only a few things in life you can count on. Death,
taxes, Dennis Rodman getting ejected -- and a new high in the stock market.

Rarely a day goes by without an excited radio  report saying "the Dow Jones
set a record today, breaking (fill in blank) for the very first time!"

 
  And if you are like a lot of people, you figure this is good news. After
all, when things were  bad, the market crashed. Remember 1929, when people
were on the street corners, selling pencils?

  So, applying caveman logic, you figure,  "crash bad -- boom, good."  And
considering the market was  below 2,500 at the start of this decade, and it is
now at 7,500 --  wait a second, make that 7,600, no wait, 7,700 -- you have to
figure this is not only a good time for America, it must be a grrrrrreat time.

  So where's your new car? Where's your vacation home? How come your kids'
college education isn't paid for?

  After all, if the Dow Jones can triple its worth in seven years, you
personally  ought to be worth at least double, right?

  Wrong. And here is where this all comes apart. The stock market used to
reflect the economy, jobs, people.

  Now the stock market reflects . . . stocks.

Just  make it up

  Oh, this isn't what the analysts will say. They'll say "the economy caused
the market to jump." Unless they say "the economy caused the market to slump."

  (Honest to goodness, I think  these stock market experts sit in a smoky
room playing cards until four o'clock, when one of them says, "Hey. Frank.
It's your turn. Go out and tell the reporters somethin'."

  "What should I tell  'em?"

  "I dunno. Use the inflation thing.")

  The fact is, the market has gone haywire -- it took 15 years to go from
1,000 to 2,000 and 10 years to go from 2,000 to 7,000 -- but all the analysis
in the world can't change a simple fact: American workers are not doing nearly
as well in life as their companies are doing on Wall Street.

  How can this be? 

  Simple. For stocks to go up, investors  have to buy them. For investors to
buy them, they have to be "attractive." Being "attractive" means showing "good
numbers." And "good numbers"  means one thing: high profits, low costs.

  Of course,  the fastest way to lower your costs is to get rid of things,
including people. Trim the fat. Downsize. Make your company lean and mean. I
now have worked for a number of companies who care less about  how much money
you bring in than they do about how much you cost.

  In other words, if you cost $10, but bring in $20, you are less desirable
than if you cost $1 and bring in $5.

  Go figure.

Just  raid it

  As a result, even companies doing well are not necessarily raising
salaries, or hiring new, talented workers, or expanding products or increasing
quality.

  No, these companies are in  competition with other companies to show "good
numbers," in order to woo the dollars from outside investors and raise their
stock price, raise their stock price! And why is this so important?

  1)  People at the very top tend to get much richer from rising stock prices
than they do from salaries. One out of every 15 companies in the Fortune 500
gave their CEOs at least $1 million stock options  last year. That means every
time the stock rises $1, those guys are worth $1 million more.

  2) If the stock price goes high enough, the company can take all that money
and buy up another company.  And then it can shave that one down.

  It's a pretty vicious cycle, one that suggests that soon the whole world
will be owned by five corporations. Meanwhile, the average American works
longer, harder  and is more exhausted at the end of the day than ever.

  Now it's true, if workers own stock, they can benefit from the surging
market. But most Americans don't own but a thimble's worth of shares,  or
maybe a dollop of pension fund. And you need to keep your job to earn that
pension.

  Meanwhile, companies keep slashing workers and benefits, saying "We have an
obligation to our stockholders."  How about the obligation to their employees?

  So don't be fooled by the booming Dow Jones. The market has become a game
of smoke and mirrors, a bunch of bathing beauties parading in front of
investors,  trying to get their money. What matters most is the figures, the
figures.

  The problem is most of us don't live in the land of figures. We live in the
land of jobs, shoes for the kids, and trying  to get home before our families
are asleep.

  Every time I hear another stock market record, it reminds me of the movie
"Wall Street," where Michael Douglas' character, Gordon Gekko, delivers his
credo:  "Greed is good."

  I don't know if it's good, but it sure is busy.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>
THIS ELECTRONIC VERSION MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THE PRINTED ARTICLE.
</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
COLUMN; STOCK; EMPLOYEE
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
