<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9502010084
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
951011
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Wednesday, October 11, 1995
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
SPT
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1D
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>
Photo
</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>


:
O.J.  Simpson
</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>
SEE ALSO METRO EDITION, Page 1D
</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1995, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
O.J. INTERVIEW A SIGN OF OUR SOCIETY'S ILLS
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
O.J. Simpson had nine months to tell his story. He didn't speak. His lawyers
said,  "We can't risk it." So he sat silent during his trial, as experts
suggested he killed his ex-wife and her friend  in cold blood. He sat silent,
and he won his freedom. And after the verdict, one of his lawyers admitted,
"Had he talked, one mistake would have ruined him."

  That doesn't seem to worry O.J. tonight,  when he gets an hour of
uninterrupted network TV to tell his version of the story -- as part of a
three-hour extravaganza "Dateline NBC." Then again, why should O.J. worry? His
freedom is no longer at stake. The perky Katie Couric and dour Tom Brokaw are
hardly Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden. O.J. is back to the business he
left: the image business.

  And from where he sits, he can only go  up.
  So he will come on TV tonight, and millions will watch, and the sad truth
is more people will decide his guilt or innocence based on his eyes, his voice
and what he says to two TV employees than  on what they saw for nearly a year
in court. We are Americans. We watch, therefore we believe.
  Simpson knows this. So do the people advising him. The right TV moment can
change your life. Think of  Ronald Reagan embarrassing Jimmy Carter during the
debates with "There you go again." Next thing you knew, Reagan was president.
  So O.J. will be interviewed -- not in an open press conference, where
anyone can ask a tough question, but in a closed TV studio, at his old
network, NBC, through a deal set up by an exec and old friend, Don Ohlmeyer.
  O.J. seems comfortable. Why not? He's an actor.  And anyone who thinks he
isn't practicing his lines doesn't understand public relations.
  Which is what this is all about. 
  And it's shameful.
Money, money, money
  Not because he's being interviewed.  Let's make that clear. He deserves a
chance to tell his story, and any decent journalist would interview him, just
as they would have interviewed Lee Harvey Oswald. It is not the interview that
is disturbing.  It's that O.J. dictated the terms. That he chose the network.
That he got it live and prime time. And that NBC, in a stone-face attempt to
hide its glee, is telling people how it won't make any money  on the
broadcast, since it won't air commercials during the interview part. "We will
actually lose $1.4 million," said Andy Lack, the head of NBC News.
  Hmm. Beware of people who brag about how much  money they're losing. It
usually means they're making it somewhere else.
  Let's play straight here, fellas. Naturally, NBC won't air commercials
during the interview. What company would risk having  its ad appear seconds
after Simpson says something that outrages millions of people? Instead, the
companies put commercials in the hour before and the hour after the interview.
They know they'll have  a huge audience for both. It's like the Super Bowl: a
pregame show and a postgame show.
  Ask yourself a simple question: If this thing isn't about ratings and
money -- why are they making it three  hours long?
  Which brings us to the advertisers. I asked NBC for a list, but a spokesman
told me, "It's not our policy to reveal names of sponsors." The spokesman did
say that none of them canceled its scheduled ads.
  This means: 1) they have no problem with the program or 2) they can't
resist the huge rating it's bound to get.
  Either way is disgusting. Because if nothing else, they are giving a known
wife beater a perfect stage to redeem himself -- and the victim of his abuse
can't respond. She's dead.
The rest of the story
  And this is the real issue here. Simpson may or may not  be guilty of
killing his ex-wife, Nicole, but he is certainly guilty of beating her to a
pulp. That was his voice screaming, "Bitch! I'll kill you!" on a 911 tape.
That was his wife screaming desperately  for help. How can anyone endorse a
three-hour TV special for such a person? Any woman who has been abused by a
violent husband will sit there tonight in disbelief.
  And here is what they'll likely  see: O.J. crying over his past sins.
Sounding sincere. And quite possibly lying through his teeth.
  Cynical? Check out an issue of New York magazine from a few weeks ago --
before the verdict. In  a story called "The Rehabilitation of O.J.," five
celebrity publicists -- what a job -- predicted what they would do if O.J.
were acquitted:
  This is from the publicist who handles Nancy Kerrigan: "O.J. would have to
pursue a course of profound humility . . ."
  From the publicist who handles George Steinbrenner: "He can't be exuberant
by any means . . ."
  From the publicist who handles Mia  Farrow: "I'd let him do one TV
interview . . . with someone believable like Barbara Walters . . . to prove
he's really a nice guy."
  Cynical? If you're not cynical about celebrity, you're deaf.
  So the dance begins tonight. Who knows, Simpson may waltz all the way back
to a TV job. We are, after all, a visual society. We like stars. We fall for
looks.
  But after all is said and done, tonight's  three-hour special will serve
only two main purposes: to rebuild O.J. and to sell a lot of soap.
  If you think those are worthwhile causes, by all means, watch the whole
thing. And heaven help you.
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>

</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
O.J. SIMPSON
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
