<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<BODY.CONTENT>
<UID>
9910170053
</UID>
<PUBLICATION>
DETROIT FREE PRESS
</PUBLICATION>
<DATE>
991017
</DATE>
<TDATE>
Sunday, October 17, 1999
</TDATE>
<EDITION>
METRO FINAL
</EDITION>
<SECTION>
COM; SUNDAY VOICES
</SECTION>
<PAGE>
1F
</PAGE>
<ILLUSTRATION>

</ILLUSTRATION>
<CAPTION>

</CAPTION>
<BYLINE>
MITCH ALBOM
</BYLINE>
<AFFILIATION>

</AFFILIATION>
<MEMO>

</MEMO>
<COPYRIGHT>
Copyright (c) 1999, Detroit Free Press
</COPYRIGHT>
<HEADLINE>
WHO CARES ABOUT END OF THE WORLD?
</HEADLINE>
<SUBHEAD>

</SUBHEAD>
<CORRECTION>

</CORRECTION>
<BODY>
If there's one thing that should get everyone's attention, it's the end of the
world.

BOOM!

Do we have your attention?

Maybe, maybe not. Last week, a huge setback occurred in the nuclear bomb
arena. The United States -- which leads the planet in nuclear technology the
way the Atlanta Braves lead baseball in good pitching -- rejected a treaty
that outlaws exploding nuclear devices for testing purposes.

Let me repeat: We rejected it.

That's the United States, a country that preaches peace and democracy, a
country that claims to have nuclear weapons only to keep the bad guys from
getting any wild ideas, a country that swore after dropping the bomb on Japan
in World War II that it would do everything it could to see that such inhuman
disaster never occurred again.

And we rejected the treaty.

Over politics.

And how many of us even noticed?



Battle over Clinton

Remember, we're talking nuclear bombs here. End of the world. Bye-bye,
humanity. And yet, a chance to freeze the nuclear race where it is and to
outlaw any future underground nuclear explosions was shamefully ignored by
both the politicians and the citizens of this country.

How? First, the politicians. The Democrats wanted this treaty ratified. They
were frustrated by the holdup being orchestrated by the Republicans. They
pushed for a vote because they felt the treaty was a good thing and there is
an election year coming. Besides, ratification would be a star on President
Bill Clinton's record.

The Republicans, meanwhile, had their own selfish agendas. They hate Clinton
so ferociously that they are willing to do anything to make him look bad, even
revert to the isolationism of the '20s and '30s. Clinton wanted this treaty?
Then they didn't. Like kids in a schoolyard brawl, they swing so wildly they
seem to have no recognition of what they're knocking over.

And so, while offering limp defenses that this treaty would somehow limit the
U.S. nuclear edge while other nations cheated (don't you think the other
nations say the same thing about us?) the Republican-led Senate voted it down,
51-48. So there. They showed the Democrats. They showed Clinton. Push us, will
you? Take that.

"It has long been a point of honor that there are matters that rise above the
riffraff of politics," Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia wrote in the New York
Times. "But the Senate's handling of the treaty proves that anything, even an
arms control treaty of international consequences, can now be cannon fodder in
a partisan war. Partisanship has completely eclipsed statesmanship."

You can say that again. Political infighting paralyzed the presidency during
this year's impeachment trial. Now the same thing has all but killed a treaty
that was decades in the making. And it sends a message to the world: The last
superpower refuses to agree to any restrictions -- which, of course, will lead
other nations to say, "Why should we?"

Around the globe, there was anger and distress. Germany's defense minister
called the decision "absolutely wrong." France's president lamented it as "a
setback to ...disarmament." China expressed "profound regret."

And in America? We watched TV.



Battle for attention

Be honest. How much time did you spend talking about this vote at the dinner
table? How much of the local news was devoted to the issue?

Hardly any. We have our routines, our cell phones, our cable TV. You want to
know how politicians can get away with irresponsible behavior? It's because
they know, deep down, that most Americans aren't even paying attention. When
time comes to vote in an election, they won't recall who supported the nuclear
test ban treaty or who didn't. They'll cast their vote based on sound bites,
image, sexual history.

The future of the world will barely enter into it.

It's hard to say which is more to blame in this whole thing, the politicians
or the voters, the system or the people practicing it. But let's remember that
we live in a world where nuclear horror has reared its ugly head already.

And if those who ignore history are really doomed to repeat it, then what does
that suggest for people too busy with their own petty issues to hear the
biggest boom of all?

Hello? Anybody out there?





MITCH ALBOM can be reached at 313-223-4581 or  albom@freepress.com. Listen to
Mitch's radio show, "Albom in the Afternoon," 3-6 p.m. weekdays on WJR-AM
(760).
</BODY>
<DISCLAIMER>
THIS ELECTRONIC VERSION MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THE PRINTED ARTICLE.
</DISCLAIMER>
<KEYWORDS>
COLUMN
</KEYWORDS>
</BODY.CONTENT>
